BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message . net...
"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Does anyone else see a pattern
with the Democratic Party.
Seems they preach and preach about freedom, but always do their best to
take it away from us against The Constitution. It's frustrating!



Stop with this garbage about the Democratic party. Those wanting to take
our freedoms and everything else from us come from both parties so cut the
crap and be prepared to defend those rights from assault no matter which
party they come from.

Problem is that the Dems are constantly fighting so hard to try to
remove from us one of the most important means by which we can defend
our rights. And yes, I *AM* referring to the RKBA.

"Rutger" wrote in message
om...
RKBA.

I'll probably be sorry about asking, but what is the RKBA?

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

"Rutger" wrote in message
om...
RKBA.

I'll probably be sorry about asking, but what is the RKBA?

No you won't.


He's talking about the 2nd Amendment. The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute. The right has been tied to the state militias as not an
individual right. Of course, I agree with Jefferson's interpretation of
the right to bear arms, being as the government always moves to get too big
for its breeches and should sometimes be made to look down the business end
of a gun barrel. However, I don't think Jefferson anticipated that the
barrels of the people's guns are puny and minuscule compared to those of big
brother.

" jls" wrote in message
t...

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

"Rutger" wrote in message
om...
RKBA.

I'll probably be sorry about asking, but what is the RKBA?

The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

" jls" wrote in message
t...

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

"Rutger" wrote in message
om...
RKBA.

I'll probably be sorry about asking, but what is the RKBA?

The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?



Supreme court of the united states...

Jay

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

" jls" wrote in message
t...

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

"Rutger" wrote in message
om...
RKBA.

I'll probably be sorry about asking, but what is the RKBA?

The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?



Supreme Court of da US

" jls" wrote in message ...

snip
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?



Supreme Court of da US



Wouldn't that be SCODUS?

"Blueskies" wrote in message
.. .

" jls" wrote in message
...

snip
absolute.

Now I feel stupid. Got the "RKBA" now, but what is a Scotus?



Supreme Court of da US



Wouldn't that be SCODUS?

Oops, yep, you is right. And ain't you full o' wit this mornin'?

jls wrote:

He's talking about the 2nd Amendment. The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute. The right has been tied to the state militias as not an
individual right.

As far as I know, this is not correct. The only statement of SCOTUS on this matter
with which I am familiar is a statement to the effect that "the right of the people"
definitely is an individual right. This is based on the fact that the only two other
places in the Bill of Rights in which this phrase occurs cannot by any stretch of the
imagination be interpreted otherwise. To what case are you referring?

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

I don't see anything confusing about the 2nd Amendment. Of course
the Libs will read it to their advantage.

It protects two things:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,

shall not be infringed."

Now the Libs will have you believe that the only right we have is
to bear them collectively under the banner of a militia. Not so.

Otis "From my cold dead hands" Winslow









" jls" wrote in message
t...

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
. net...

"Rutger" wrote in message
om...
RKBA.

I'll probably be sorry about asking, but what is the RKBA?

No you won't.


He's talking about the 2nd Amendment. The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute. The right has been tied to the state militias as not an
individual right. Of course, I agree with Jefferson's interpretation of
the right to bear arms, being as the government always moves to get too
big
for its breeches and should sometimes be made to look down the business
end
of a gun barrel. However, I don't think Jefferson anticipated that the
barrels of the people's guns are puny and minuscule compared to those of
big
brother.