![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I happen to subscribe to the believe that the best player(s) should win.
Boeing has been trailing Airbus for some years now, both in technological development and in marketing strategy. Condit has paid the price, which I'm sure came as a surprise to no one here, and the company is logically paying the price in market share. There is room for both, of course, and there is a serious issue regarding subsidies. If you listen to Boeing execs, they'll tell you you don't contribute anything to the 7E7 program until you actually fly in one, whereas the A380 will cost a lot to the European taxpayers, even if they never fly, and particularly if it's not successful. The truth, as usual, is a bit more shades of grey, as both companies have received and will continue to receive considerable subsidies - but Boeing has a point nevertheless. No one will ask the European citizens their opinion before bailing out Airbus, should the A380 fail to meet expectations. In fact, they will never even be told the full amount of the subsidy they're to hit up for. You have to give Airbus some credit - not only for coming up to parity market share with Boeing in so few years, but also for forging ahead with a real market strategy. "We're tired of being shut out of long haul markets,because we have no answer to the 747, so we're going to out-jumbo the jumbo!" Time will tell if it's a good move or not, but it's at least a readable strategy, while Boeing has been flirting around for years with different flavored fantasies, before finally settling on what looks like a typical medium-haul airliner with a curvy paint scheme. It looks like the competition is good for the airlines and the travelling public, but very risky business for manufacturers. G Faris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G Farris" wrote in message
... It looks like the competition is good for the airlines and the travelling public, but very risky business for manufacturers. Mmm. Competition. How much competition is there if Airbus make the only real choice in the 500+ seat market and Boeing make the only real choice in the 200-300 seat market? :-) Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
and Boeing make the only real choice in the 200-300 seat market that's a big if, if ever I saw one. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
want to trade 601 plans for 701 plans | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 27th 05 07:50 PM |
Unused plans question | Doc Font | Home Built | 0 | December 8th 04 09:16 PM |
What are Boeing's plans? | David Lednicer | General Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 09:19 PM |
What are Boeing's plans? | David Lednicer | Military Aviation | 62 | September 27th 04 12:23 AM |
Modifying Vision plans for retractable gear... | Chris | Home Built | 1 | February 27th 04 09:23 PM |