Turbine air start -- too cold?

"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...

mercy snip

What I can't understand is why you continue to do it. You seem smarter
than to engage in such behavior.

You're not capable of understanding what happens because you are not capable
of measuring different people against the same ruler, Corky, and that's got
a name: hypocrisy. It's that simple.

I didn't start this, and I have already proven that beyond any shadow of a
doubt (and no, I don't give a damn who saw the thread or who didn't, or who
wants to see it again, go look it up yourself on Google)... but as long as
the Chucksteak steps up to the plate to get his gourd beat to a pulp every
time he opens his mouth to publicly attack people purely because he doesn't
like who they associate with, I'll be more than happy to oblige by yanking
the chain and watching the UpChuck Monkey skeletons dance.

If he doesn't like it, tough ****. That's a personal problem best discussed
with his shrink, who will probably tell him the story about the man who
stopped beating his head against the wall when he found out how good it felt
to stop.

Juan Jimenez wrote:

/ranting snipped/

If he doesn't like it, tough ****. That's a personal problem best discussed
with his shrink, who will probably tell him the story about the man who
stopped beating his head against the wall when he found out how good it felt
to stop.




Whoa, speaking of personal problems...

In article , Juan Jimenez says...

You're not capable of understanding what happens because you are not capable
of measuring different people against the same ruler, Corky, and that's got
a name: hypocrisy. It's that simple.

I'll say this...of all the people on RAH Corky is the last one I would accuse
of hypocrisy. But then one just has to consider the source of the remark and his
credibility and the credibility of who he writes for.


I didn't start this, and I have already proven that beyond any shadow of a
doubt (and no, I don't give a damn who saw the thread or who didn't, or who
wants to see it again, go look it up yourself on Google)...

I think I said something about jaun being a toady for zoom .A little thin
skinned about the truth?

but as long as
the Chucksteak steps up to the plate to get his gourd beat to a pulp every
time he opens his mouth to publicly attack people purely because he doesn't
like who they associate with,

I guess if it makes you secure to think I was beat to a pulp ...enjoy. But like
your hero zoom you give yourself way too much credit. Speaking of credit, been
paid by zoom lately? :-)

I don't like you because you approve and condone a guy who is a liar,(I got
proof)who charges for ads that companies didn't sign contracts for then bills
them (I got proof) calls the employers of people who disagree with him and tries
to get them fired(I got proof) passes himself off as a test pilot ,didn't pay
his writers and ad salesman(I got proof) etc.,etc., remember I have boxes and
boxes of Tony's records . Things like court transcripts ,police records a list
of all zooms lawsuits. Unlike you I can prove anything I say.
You can say what you want but it's all about credibility .Your credibility which
you squandered away,zoom's credibility which he squandered away and ANN's
credibility which both of you are squandering away.

You better keep writing for zoom because unlike others who left zoom you'll
never write for a legitimate aviation publication.You'd be surprised who lurks
on this list and what they think of you and zoom. By the way I had a nice talk
with Tim Kerns today. Very interesting.....

(Snip of childish blabber.)


Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret


"monkeys are cuter than toadies and not as slimey" ..one eyed Louie the pirate

In article ,
says...

In article , Juan Jimenez says..
.

You're not capable of understanding what happens because you are not
capable
of measuring different people against the same ruler, Corky, and that
's got
a name: hypocrisy. It's that simple.

I'll say this...of all the people on RAH Corky is the last one I woul
d accuse
of hypocrisy. But then one just has to consider the source of the rema
rk and his
credibility and the credibility of who he writes for.


I didn't start this, and I have already proven that beyond any shadow
of a
doubt (and no, I don't give a damn who saw the thread or who didn't,
or who
wants to see it again, go look it up yourself on Google)...

I think I said something about jaun being a toady for zoom .A little t
hin
skinned about the truth?

but as long as
the Chucksteak steps up to the plate to get his gourd beat to a pulp
every
time he opens his mouth to publicly attack people purely because he d
oesn't
like who they associate with,

I guess if it makes you secure to think I was beat to a pulp ...enjoy.
But like
your hero zoom you give yourself way too much credit. Speaking of cre
dit, been
paid by zoom lately? :-)

I don't like you because you approve and condone a guy who is a liar,(
I got
proof)who charges for ads that companies didn't sign contracts for the
n bills
them (I got proof) calls the employers of people who disagree with him
and tries
to get them fired(I got proof) passes himself off as a test pilot ,did
n't pay
his writers and ad salesman(I got proof) etc.,etc., remember I have bo
xes and
boxes of Tony's records . Things like court transcripts ,police record
s a list
of all zooms lawsuits. Unlike you I can prove anything I say.
You can say what you want but it's all about credibility .Your credibi
lity which
you squandered away,zoom's credibility which he squandered away and AN
N's
credibility which both of you are squandering away.

You better keep writing for zoom because unlike others who left zoom y
ou'll
never write for a legitimate aviation publication.You'd be surprised w
ho lurks
on this list and what they think of you and zoom. By the way I had a n
ice talk
with Tim Kerns today. Very interesting.....

(Snip of childish blabber.)


Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret


"monkeys are cuter than toadies and not as slimey" ..one eyed Louie t
he pirate

Juan has been spouting the same crap for a long time now but he has yet
to produce a single thing to back it up. Sooner or later he has to
produce something to back it up or the world knows what a liar he is.
It reached that point a long time ago and he is so stupid that he
hasn't figured it out yet.

Maybe that's how he gets his paycheck out of mooz. Yowser massa I is
gonna bad mouf dat nasty Chuck agin today ifen ya giv me da money ya
owes me.

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez says...

I think I said something about jaun being a toady for zoom .A little thin
skinned about the truth?

What is it that you think you know about truth?

I guess if it makes you secure to think I was beat to a pulp ...enjoy. But
like
your hero zoom you give yourself way too much credit. Speaking of credit,
been
paid by zoom lately? :-)

He pays me just like I pay my son for his chores, right on time. Is that
your conscience asking? :-) right back.

I don't like you because you approve and condone a guy who is a liar

That must be why you hate yourself and your brownnosing friends so much,
bucko.

You better keep writing for zoom because unlike others who left zoom
you'll
never write for a legitimate aviation publication.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! What are those, size 22 blinders? chuckle That's
funny!

You'd be surprised who lurks on this list and what they think of you and
zoom. By the way I had a nice talk
with Tim Kerns today. Very interesting.....

Oooo, I'm impressed... I do the same every time I see him. chuckle

In article , Juan Jimenez says...

What is it that you think you know about truth?

I know I can prove what I say, you never do . Names ,Dates,Court records etc..
please.


He pays me just like I pay my son for his chores, right on time. Is that
your conscience asking? :-) right back.

Meaning what?? Names ,dates,facts, please....

I don't like you because you approve and condone a guy who is a liar

That must be why you hate yourself and your brownnosing friends so much,
bucko.

That statement made no sense what so ever ..dupa


You better keep writing for zoom because unlike others who left zoom
you'll
never write for a legitimate aviation publication.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! What are those, size 22 blinders? chuckle That's
funny!

Another unenlightening statement. What legitimate aviation publications do you
write for that I can't see ? Names ,dates etc...


You'd be surprised who lurks on this list and what they think of you and
zoom. By the way I had a nice talk
with Tim Kerns today. Very interesting.....

Oooo, I'm impressed... I do the same every time I see him. chuckle


Gee another illogical statement. That's 3 . How can you see him? your in PR and
he's not. Better get a grip.


Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

Credibility it was always about credibility.....chuck s

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez says...

What is it that you think you know about truth?

I know I can prove what I say, you never do.

Sure you can, like you can prove Jim took pics of you at OSH after changing
lenses, when everyone in the trailer knows we only had two lenses, and I had
the other one on the D60. chuckle

He pays me just like I pay my son for his chores, right on time. Is that
your conscience asking? :-) right back.

Meaning what?? Names ,dates,facts, please....

Is that your conscience asking?

Another unenlightening statement. What legitimate aviation publications do
you
write for that I can't see ?

Who cares what you can or cannot see? Put that paper sack back on your head!


It's all about the credibility you never had.

In article , Juan Jimenez says...



Sure you can, like you can prove Jim took pics of you at OSH after changing
lenses, when everyone in the trailer knows we only had two lenses, and I had
the other one on the D60. chuckle

Hmm seems zoom had those pics he took on the ANN page . Tell ya what just for
the hell of it I'll admit I might have been wrong about zoom changing lenses
Lets just say I was.I find it hard to believe that a high priced outfit like ANN
has only 2 lenses but I'll concede that he didn't change lenses. But he did take
the pictures and we saw him do it .Didn't you see us laughing and waving at him
in the picture? By the way what color was the lens he used? I have a photo of
him and I know the color of the lens do you?

Now that I conceded the lens caper .How about you telling me the names of my
kids you claim are drug addicts and had their kids taken away by social
services. Names ,dates, court records ect... Prove your credibility..


Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...

Sure you can, like you can prove Jim took pics of you at OSH after
changing
lenses, when everyone in the trailer knows we only had two lenses, and I
had
the other one on the D60. chuckle

Hmm seems zoom had those pics he took on the ANN page . Tell ya what just
for
the hell of it I'll admit I might have been wrong about zoom changing
lenses
Lets just say I was.I find it hard to believe that a high priced outfit
like ANN
has only 2 lenses but I'll concede that he didn't change lenses. But he
did take
the pictures and we saw him do it .Didn't you see us laughing and waving
at him
in the picture? By the way what color was the lens he used? I have a photo
of
him and I know the color of the lens do you?

Two cameras, two lenses, Jim had a very nice white large stabilized lens, I
had the small lens. There's no need for more when there's a third-party pro
photog covering the show.

Now that I conceded the lens caper .How about you telling me the names of
my
kids you claim are drug addicts and had their kids taken away by social
services. Names ,dates, court records ect... Prove your credibility..

Amazing how worked up you get about the things that happen and don't happen
in my family, Chuck.

I'm impressed with the step you've taken, though. It shows that there's hope
for you yet, even if it only took you nearly four years to make this much
progress, and even if you did it just "for the hell of it." Now that you've
figured out how to let go of one issue, perhaps you'll make the leap and let
go of _all_ the issues you think you have against me.

Could it be that you are smart enough to realize that attacking and/or
insulting me (or anyone else) out of the blue in a public forum simply
because you don't like the people with whom I associate is a very bad idea?
If you are not sure of the answer to this, go to ANN and search for your
name in the archives, and see if anything that comes up in the search has my
name on it, in the byline or anywhere else... A clue, Sherlock.