![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Megginson wrote:
I recently few my Warrior up to 9000 ft near maximum gross (2440 lb), to get clear of cloudtops -- it was a hot day, so the density altitude was well over 10,000 ft. It takes a little while to climb up there on a hot day, but it's not a big deal, even with 160 hp. I imagine that an Archer could handle it much more easily. Thanks for the tips. The reason I'm asking is that I've never heard/seen anyone flying 10000 ft in an Archer or equivalent here in Finland. Of course we don't have any terrain requiring that kind of altitude, but the weather and controlled airspace (some airways start at 9500ft) sometimes require higher altitudes. It's nice to know that it's possible, like the aircraft manual says too. Regards, Lasse |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lasse Hero writes:
It's nice to know that it's possible, like the aircraft manual says too. It's possible, but you need to control the airspeed carefully and be very patient -- I often saw negative readings on the VSI when I hit downdrafts, but when I just held my climb speed, eventually the ALT would start winding up again. The POH numbers assume Vy all the way up, but I'd be worried about cooling -- next time, I think that if I cannot climb at 85-90 kias, I'll go up in steps, climbing Vy for a while and then levelling off at a higher speed to cool the engine a little. In the winter in Finland (as in Canada), it should be much easier, since the density altitude at 10,000 ft will be at least a couple of thousand feet lower. By the way, I spent a few days in Vaasa in the late 1990's. It's a beautiful area, and the pine and birch remind me a lot of northern Ontario (that's probably why so many people from Finland settled in that part of Canada). All the best, David -- David Megginson, , http://www.megginson.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lasse Hero wrote in news:mVMYa.452$jY3.157
@reader1.news.jippii.net: David Megginson wrote: I recently few my Warrior up to 9000 ft near maximum gross (2440 lb), to get clear of cloudtops -- it was a hot day, so the density altitude was well over 10,000 ft. It takes a little while to climb up there on a hot day, but it's not a big deal, even with 160 hp. I imagine that an Archer could handle it much more easily. Thanks for the tips. The reason I'm asking is that I've never heard/seen anyone flying 10000 ft in an Archer or equivalent here in Finland. Of course we don't have any terrain requiring that kind of altitude, but the weather and controlled airspace (some airways start at 9500ft) sometimes require higher altitudes. It's nice to know that it's possible, like the aircraft manual says too. Regards, Lasse I flew an Archer II on my first cross-country vacation in June, and often cruised at 11,500 or 12,500 (although it was just me, my luggage, and full tanks). It took me 23 minutes to climb from Bakersfield (KBFL, 507 feet elev) to 12,500 on a warm day. Flying at the higher altitudes on my vacation kept me above mountains and turbulence. Plus, I liked knowing that my options were better in the event that I lost the engine. More experienced pilots might have flown lower. -John Ross |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Pricing | David R Townend | Home Built | 0 | January 2nd 05 03:20 AM |
Looking for Archer | Ben | Aviation Marketplace | 2 | December 12th 04 05:18 PM |
World War II Flying 'Ace' Salutes Racial Progress, By Gerry J. Gilmore | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 03:33 AM |
Charity Auction - Flight in a Piper Archer over Cambridge | Charlie | General Aviation | 0 | October 8th 03 09:50 AM |
Piper Archer III or Cessna 172SP | Dale Harwell | Owning | 10 | July 15th 03 04:01 AM |