![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick Durden wrote:
snip Because of the FAA's extremely conservative certification procedures for composites, the structures are far, far stronger than metal airplanes, which is why they also weigh as much. The FAA certification procedures took away the weight advantage of composites, but what it did was give us airplanes that are evern more overbuilt than the Grumman Ironworks figthers of WWII. Generalising quite a bit there a few other issues apart from the conservative safety factor in strength requirements which tend to increase weight in composites. The stiffness issue which often requires extra material (most composites have 1% strain at yield) Low work of fracture compared to metals. Difficulty in inspection for defects especially after minor impact damage considering that damage can be at some distance from the impact point. regards jc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |