![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message ws.com...
"Byron Miller" wrote in message ... Nicest controllers, safe airport and friendly skies. They're not any more incompetant than a "guvenment" controller and most certainly they enjoy aviation and the lifestyle just as much as anyone else could! Well this may be just coincidence and in any event when n=2 not all that much can be concluded, but for what it is worth I have had two experiences when controllers gave me instructions while low altitude in IMC which could have resulted in a controlled flight into terrain accident, and both situations occurred at a non-towered field -- once at Morgantown WV KMGW and once at Johnstown PA KJST. Richard, Perhaps I'm not following the juxtaposition. Are you saying that contract tower controllers gave you these instructions, or that FAA controllers gave you these instructions whilst you were operating at a non-towered airport for which they provide approach/departure services? I have to admit the "proceed direct MGW" part might have caught us. Thanks very much for the heads-up, we'll be on alert for that kind of thing. Cheers, Sydney |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Snowbird" wrote in message om... Perhaps I'm not following the juxtaposition. Are you saying that contract tower controllers gave you these instructions, or that FAA controllers gave you these instructions whilst you were operating at a non-towered airport for which they provide approach/departure services? The instructions were from a controller at a non-federal control tower. So it was a controller who was not an FAA employee. When I mentioned "non-towered" that was my error; I meant "non-Federal towered". I have to admit the "proceed direct MGW" part might have caught us. Thanks very much for the heads-up, we'll be on alert for that kind of thing. Yes, very subtle and very scary.. and I am convinced the controller used the terminology precisely because when he finally assumed terrain responsibility he said "Fly Heading XXX, Center Assigned Heading". I interpret that to mean "I check with Center and I am stating for the tape that Center is responsible for terrain if you hit something on that heading." -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Kaplan" wrote in message s.com... The instructions were from a controller at a non-federal control tower. So it was a controller who was not an FAA employee. When I mentioned "non-towered" that was my error; I meant "non-Federal towered". My A/FD is almost two years old, but it indicates MGW is an FAA Contract Tower and JST is still an FAA tower. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message k.net... My A/FD is almost two years old, but it indicates MGW is an FAA Contract Tower and JST is still an FAA tower. JST is a shared military-civilian field and I thought this affects procedures/staffing. For example, JST tower always reminds pilots "check gear down" which is not something done at a "standard" FAA tower. But you might be correct that this is different from being an FAA Contract tower. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Kaplan" wrote in message s.com... JST is a shared military-civilian field and I thought this affects procedures/staffing. For example, JST tower always reminds pilots "check gear down" which is not something done at a "standard" FAA tower. But you might be correct that this is different from being an FAA Contract tower. Yes, there is a difference between an FAA tower and an FAA contract tower, but the difference is transparent to the flying public. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article t,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: My A/FD is almost two years old, but it indicates MGW is an FAA Contract Tower and JST is still an FAA tower. Forgive me for being dense, but the original poster said that Lancaster (LNS) is a contract tower. I'm looking at my new A/FD, and I can't seem to find out where it says that LNS is a contract tower. Where is this listed? --Ken |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Hornstein" wrote in message ... Forgive me for being dense, but the original poster said that Lancaster (LNS) is a contract tower. I'm looking at my new A/FD, and I can't seem to find out where it says that LNS is a contract tower. Where is this listed? In the communications section of the airport's listing of the A/FD, immediately following the tower frequency. You'll find FCT for an FAA Contract Tower, NFCT for a non-federal control tower, and nothing at all for an FAA tower. My NE A/FD is a bit out of date, but it shows LNS to be an FAA tower. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: In the communications section of the airport's listing of the A/FD, immediately following the tower frequency. You'll find FCT for an FAA Contract Tower, NFCT for a non-federal control tower, and nothing at all for an FAA tower. My NE A/FD is a bit out of date, but it shows LNS to be an FAA tower. Ah, okay, I had to look around a bit, but I found some examples of this. ASH is a FAA Contract Tower, and it looks like MTN is a contract tower part of the time, and a non-federal control tower some of the other time. At least, that's my interpretation of listing for MTN ... I wonder why that is? Man, it seems like every time I look at the A/FD, I find something new. --Ken |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Hornstein" wrote in message ... Ah, okay, I had to look around a bit, but I found some examples of this. ASH is a FAA Contract Tower, and it looks like MTN is a contract tower part of the time, and a non-federal control tower some of the other time. At least, that's my interpretation of listing for MTN ... I wonder why that is? It has to be an error. Note that the hours of operation as an FCT coincide with the Class D hours. I suspect this was an NFCT that became an FCT, and the "NFCT" mysteriously remained in the A/FD. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
MN Airport Closure Notification Legislation (S.F. 2178/H.F. 2737) | Dan Hoehn | General Aviation | 1 | May 25th 04 01:52 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |