![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Byron Miller" wrote in message ...
I have been learning to fly and hanging out at KLNS (Lancaster PA) for years, and it has been a privatized airport tower ever since i've known about it. Nicest controllers, safe airport and friendly skies. They're not any more incompetant than a "guvenment" controller and most certainly they enjoy aviation and the lifestyle just as much as anyone else could! Heck they even volunteer to the ground schools and give tours when the FAA allows! Just thought i'd throw that in ![]() The big ATC privatization issue is not so much about the tower guys at your little class D airports. The big worry is more about enroute stuff, centers, approach, departure, clearance delivery and all of a sudden everyone getting repeatedly billed large sums of money just for flying thru some airspace handled by some private corporation that will staff these positions with personnel the quality of a typical computer tech support script-parrot. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "One's Too Many" wrote in message om... "Byron Miller" wrote in message ... I have been learning to fly and hanging out at KLNS (Lancaster PA) for years, and it has been a privatized airport tower ever since i've known about it. Nicest controllers, safe airport and friendly skies. They're not any more incompetant than a "guvenment" controller and most certainly they enjoy aviation and the lifestyle just as much as anyone else could! Heck they even volunteer to the ground schools and give tours when the FAA allows! Just thought i'd throw that in ![]() The big ATC privatization issue is not so much about the tower guys at your little class D airports. The big worry is more about enroute stuff, centers, approach, departure, clearance delivery and all of a sudden everyone getting repeatedly billed large sums of money just for flying thru some airspace handled by some private corporation that will staff these positions with personnel the quality of a typical computer tech support script-parrot. Given the FAA retains Certification and enforcement powers, which everyone agrees is an inherently governmental function, the qualification scare tactic is obviously a red herring. Fees are a big issue but privatization doesn't have to mean the money earned by private contractors comes from any source other than where it comes now. It is very equitable to burden fuel with the fees; that way 777's pay more than Cessna 150's, and no one would ever have to choose not to call a FSS, ask for Flight Folowing or file IFR because they'd rather not incur the cost. Just pay them out of those funds based on some formula. That isn't rocket science. I'm sure wages, job security and retirement pay is better for Federal workers than the contractors but this has nothing to do with the tone of the debate ![]() -Greg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"One's Too Many" wrote in message
om... Just thought i'd throw that in ![]() The big ATC privatization issue is not so much about the tower guys at your little class D airports. The big worry is more about enroute stuff, centers, approach, departure, clearance delivery and all of a sudden everyone getting repeatedly billed large sums of money just for flying thru some airspace handled by some private corporation that will staff these positions with personnel the quality of a typical computer tech support script-parrot. I understand that. But coming from actually knowing people "on the inside" alot of what the FAA uses is from private companies/organizations. I'm sure my lil Class D airport isn't reall the issue, but on the flipside, most class B isn't for us "GA" pilots in many ways. I find landing at the class B airports to be expensive as is, so any more fees wouldn't really bother me. If i have to fly through them then i look for the VFR routes through them or i go under and around them. No sense in my lil tin can to get in the way of heavies. The only Difference between contracted and government workers to me is the people pushing the contract. IF this is a union labor vs non union labor then leave me out of it. If this is privatized - IE "contracted" airports then my point is to say there are alot of fully functional "privatized" ATC airports that work like a charm. Joe controller is still Joe controller be it he works for the government or not. Believe me, i'm all against privatizing in the sense that the FAA drops federal subsidation for aviation as that would murder the industry, but privitization via contracting out jobs to bidders isn't anything that concerns me. If our military can do it, if the business sector can do it, why can't the government sector continue to do it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
MN Airport Closure Notification Legislation (S.F. 2178/H.F. 2737) | Dan Hoehn | General Aviation | 1 | May 25th 04 01:52 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |