![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wally Samuelson" wrote in message et... I just received the October issue of Popular Mechanics. The cover story is about factory built sport planes. You don't need a license. As usual the article is long on hype and short on specifics. I would love to have a scale down of a P-51 Wow wouldn't that be a kick Wally (I've quit posting my age, Lets just say my seniority number is getting low.) I have not read the article, but let me correct a few things in your post. You do need a license. It has less training hours, and a few more restrictions. Day visual flight rules only, and to go to another towered airport, you must have a briefing from an instructor. You do not, however have to have a medical certificate. I if you have a driver' license, that is enough. The planes are limited in weight, stall speed, and top speed, and to two people. The real kick is that this is so far, just a proposal for a new rule. It could be five more months until anyone can tell you anything for sure. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You do need a license. It has less training hours, and a few more restrictions. Day visual flight rules only, and to go to another towered airport, you must have a briefing from an instructor. If this is correct, the sport pilot license is less restrictive than my recreational pilot cert. For each towered airport, I need an endorsement from my instructor. That restriction is the only thing I've ever regretted about not getting a PPL. I'd assumed in training that like the XC restriction it could be lifted by additional training and a one-time endorsement, but not so. all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But the restriction can be lifted by a checkride.
I don't know if you would need the entire private PTS, or if they would only cover what's missing from the recreational certificate. You'll probably find you have all the requirements of a private if you've been flying a while. "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... You do need a license. It has less training hours, and a few more restrictions. Day visual flight rules only, and to go to another towered airport, you must have a briefing from an instructor. If this is correct, the sport pilot license is less restrictive than my recreational pilot cert. For each towered airport, I need an endorsement from my instructor. That restriction is the only thing I've ever regretted about not getting a PPL. I'd assumed in training that like the XC restriction it could be lifted by additional training and a one-time endorsement, but not so. all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
September issue of Airman available | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 2nd 04 04:39 AM |
Bogus Issue | jls | Home Built | 2 | August 15th 04 04:47 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |
August issue of Airman now available | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 8th 03 02:48 AM |