A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nashua Festival, Avidyne and WSI



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 23rd 03, 12:50 PM
Doug Vetter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Noel wrote:
They can get away with using NT because the software in the
avidyne systems does not cause or contribute to a major hazard.


The way the rep put it, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity, so it
speeded the process of necessary approvals. The rep also thought it was
nice that he was able to connect a monitor to the back of the unit and
configure it like any other windoze application.

Windows of any kind (even stripped down for this application) is still
far inferior to a real-time version of linux, but what do the Feds
know....they're paper pushers...not engineers.

-Doug

--
--------------------
Doug Vetter, CFIMEIA

http://www.dvcfi.com
--------------------

  #2  
Old September 24th 03, 12:07 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Doug Vetter
wrote:

They can get away with using NT because the software in the
avidyne systems does not cause or contribute to a major hazard.


The way the rep put it, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity, so it
speeded the process of necessary approvals. The rep also thought it was
nice that he was able to connect a monitor to the back of the unit and
configure it like any other windoze application.

Windows of any kind (even stripped down for this application) is still
far inferior to a real-time version of linux, but what do the Feds
know....they're paper pushers...not engineers.



I didn't phrase it correctly. I should have said that the software
in the Avidyne system could not cause or contribute to a major
hazard due to a failure to provide the function. That is, the
loss of the system functionality would not be a major hazard.
While no one at Avidyne will say exactly how they protect against
hazardly misleading information (HMI), I believe that some hardware
monitor is in place to protect against HMI rather than depending
on windows NT to assure the correct functioning of the software.

Sure, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity. But don't let
that confuse you. No Windows-based software system has the software
portion certified to DO-178B level C. At best, it's only Level D, which
is trivial to do, even for Windows.

--
Bob Noel
  #3  
Old September 24th 03, 02:31 AM
Doug Vetter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Noel wrote:
snip
Sure, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity. But don't let
that confuse you. No Windows-based software system has the software
portion certified to DO-178B level C. At best, it's only Level D, which
is trivial to do, even for Windows.


I wasn't aware of its approval status, but that's comforting to know. :-)

What I really want to know is what Garmin is using for the G1000 system...

-Doug

--
--------------------
Doug Vetter, CFIMEIA

http://www.dvcfi.com
--------------------

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.