![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Noel wrote:
They can get away with using NT because the software in the avidyne systems does not cause or contribute to a major hazard. The way the rep put it, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity, so it speeded the process of necessary approvals. The rep also thought it was nice that he was able to connect a monitor to the back of the unit and configure it like any other windoze application. Windows of any kind (even stripped down for this application) is still far inferior to a real-time version of linux, but what do the Feds know....they're paper pushers...not engineers. -Doug -- -------------------- Doug Vetter, CFIMEIA http://www.dvcfi.com -------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Doug Vetter
wrote: They can get away with using NT because the software in the avidyne systems does not cause or contribute to a major hazard. The way the rep put it, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity, so it speeded the process of necessary approvals. The rep also thought it was nice that he was able to connect a monitor to the back of the unit and configure it like any other windoze application. Windows of any kind (even stripped down for this application) is still far inferior to a real-time version of linux, but what do the Feds know....they're paper pushers...not engineers. I didn't phrase it correctly. I should have said that the software in the Avidyne system could not cause or contribute to a major hazard due to a failure to provide the function. That is, the loss of the system functionality would not be a major hazard. While no one at Avidyne will say exactly how they protect against hazardly misleading information (HMI), I believe that some hardware monitor is in place to protect against HMI rather than depending on windows NT to assure the correct functioning of the software. Sure, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity. But don't let that confuse you. No Windows-based software system has the software portion certified to DO-178B level C. At best, it's only Level D, which is trivial to do, even for Windows. -- Bob Noel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Noel wrote:
snip Sure, the Feds believe NT is a known quantity. But don't let that confuse you. No Windows-based software system has the software portion certified to DO-178B level C. At best, it's only Level D, which is trivial to do, even for Windows. I wasn't aware of its approval status, but that's comforting to know. :-) What I really want to know is what Garmin is using for the G1000 system... -Doug -- -------------------- Doug Vetter, CFIMEIA http://www.dvcfi.com -------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|