![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Nery" wrote in message news:bfElb.540$9E1.5435@attbi_s52... My '66 Cherokee 180C currently has a T12C ADF. Even though it has analog tuning, the previous owner installed a Davitron digital frequency read out so it's not as bad to tune as you'd think. Anyway, it now longer points to the NDB (actually the needle never moves) but can successfully tune am radio stations. So my choices a 1 Fix it, 2 Replace it, 3 Remove it. My plane is currently certified for instrument operation (and I plan on starting my IFR training shortly). I also have a Garmin 196 (primary) and a Garmin 195 (backup - came with the plane). Given the fact that ADF is (someday) being phased up (maybe), what is the collective wisdom of the group? Which of the three choices should I pursue? Those GPS receivers won't count for much in your IFR training, but, for the ADF, I'd dump it. ADF approaches and transmitters are being decommissioned around the country wholesale, and replaced by GPS approaches which are more accurate than ADF anyway. I noticed the price of a new Garmin 155XL IFR-certified GPS is now down to just over $2,000. As soon as I can I plan to get rid of both my ADF and my DME now that GPS can substitute legally for DME. They're just taking up useful load. If you need a solution to the loss of capability to listen to AM radio, I just read an interesting article on AvWeb about satellite radio, which eliminates the need to keep tuning new stations on the ADF when you fly out of range of the stations. You have to pay $10/month for the service, but that's pretty cheap for an elegant solution to the problem, and cheaper than most anything else in aviation, that's for sure. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CriticalMass"
Those GPS receivers won't count for much in your IFR training, but, for the ADF, I'd dump it. ADF approaches and transmitters are being decommissioned around the country wholesale, and replaced by GPS approaches which are more accurate than ADF anyway. That's a little contradictory isn't it? If you are going to fly GPS approaches at small airports why wouldn't it count for much in your IFR training? I think I know where you are coming from but that position may be a bit of a problem. Outside of learning to do ILSs, everything else is button pushing. Rather than practice NDB approaches with an ADF, you do the overlay with a GPS. Same with VOR overlays. The made for GPS approaches themselves are pretty easy but there is still button pushing and it is not self-evident - especialy on misses and units like..... I noticed the price of a new Garmin 155XL IFR-certified GPS is now down to just over $2,000 Or at least the 300XL which I'm familiar with. I agree with totally with your recommendation - but get it before you train. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Maule Driver" wrote: "CriticalMass" Those GPS receivers won't count for much in your IFR training, but, for the ADF, I'd dump it. ADF approaches and transmitters are being decommissioned around the country wholesale, and replaced by GPS approaches which are more accurate than ADF anyway. That's a little contradictory isn't it? If you are going to fly GPS approaches at small airports why wouldn't it count for much in your IFR training? I believe the GPS units in question were VFR units. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Maule Driver" wrote in message m... "CriticalMass" Those GPS receivers won't count for much in your IFR training, but, for the ADF, I'd dump it. ADF approaches and transmitters are being decommissioned around the country wholesale, and replaced by GPS approaches which are more accurate than ADF anyway. That's a little contradictory isn't it? If you are going to fly GPS approaches at small airports why wouldn't it count for much in your IFR training? Because they're not IFR-certified. Not much more needs to be said, assuming the proper attitude toward flying IFR in accordance with the rules has any bearing on the matter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CriticalMass wrote:
: Those GPS receivers won't count for much in your IFR training, but, for the : ADF, I'd dump it. : ADF approaches and transmitters are being decommissioned around the country : wholesale, and replaced by GPS approaches which are more accurate than ADF : anyway. True enough, although getting IFR GPS's installed can be a somewhat pricey endeavor. I went over this idea when I was putting together the panel in my Cherokee for my IFR training. With WAAS GPS's about the depreciate all non-precision GPS's, it seemed silly to pay big bucks to get one installed. I did my training with VOR's, a DME (thanks to the wonderful KNS-80 bought and installed for a song), and ILS components. A VFR GPS can be used for situational awareness, and could be used in a pinch (read: emergency) as an ADF/DME/VOR if really necessary. I wouldn't pay to have the ADF redone. The usual sentiment is if it's installed, works, and you don't need more panel space, leave it in. Anything missing from that equation and it makes more sense to ditch it. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * The prime directive of Linux: * * - learn what you don't know, * * - teach what you do. * * (Just my 20 USm$) * ************************************************** *********************** |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... CriticalMass wrote: : Those GPS receivers won't count for much in your IFR training, but, for the : ADF, I'd dump it. : ADF approaches and transmitters are being decommissioned around the country : wholesale, and replaced by GPS approaches which are more accurate than ADF : anyway. The usual sentiment is if it's installed, works, and you don't need more panel space, leave it in. Anything missing from that equation and it makes more sense to ditch it. I think that's what I said, isn't it? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:23:50 -0500, "CriticalMass"
wrote: I noticed the price of a new Garmin 155XL IFR-certified GPS is now down to just over $2,000. not even close...... http://www.pacific-coast-avionics.co...il.asp?id=4456 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob wrote: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:23:50 -0500, "CriticalMass" wrote: I noticed the price of a new Garmin 155XL IFR-certified GPS is now down to just over $2,000. not even close...... http://www.pacific-coast-avionics.co...il.asp?id=4456 That's the installed price of a new unit and is typical. A search in Yahoo turns up prices of about $3,000 for a new unit uninstalled (yes, Garmin's policy is to only sell installed units). Several outfits are also selling reconditioned units for $2,000 to $2,300. Perhaps CriticalMass saw one of those ads. George Patterson You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Bob wrote: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:23:50 -0500, "CriticalMass" wrote: I noticed the price of a new Garmin 155XL IFR-certified GPS is now down to just over $2,000. not even close...... http://www.pacific-coast-avionics.co...il.asp?id=4456 That's the installed price of a new unit and is typical. A search in Yahoo turns up prices of about $3,000 for a new unit uninstalled (yes, Garmin's policy is to only sell installed units). Several outfits are also selling reconditioned units for $2,000 to $2,300. Perhaps CriticalMass saw one of those ads. That's the explanation, George. I saw that ad somewhere recently and missed the "factory reconditioned" fine print. Thanks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is RDS on FM not available out there? Here in the UK,
if you're listenning to one of the national FM stations and have an RDS radio (virtually all car radios have RDS)it will tune to the next transmitter as its signal exceeds that of the previous one you were tuned to. http://www.rds.org.uk/rds98/whatisrds.htm DAB (digital audio broadcasting) will also do that, though the receivers aren't that common at the moment. http://www.drdb.org/ Paul "CriticalMass" wrote in message ... If you need a solution to the loss of capability to listen to AM radio, I just read an interesting article on AvWeb about satellite radio, which eliminates the need to keep tuning new stations on the ADF when you fly out of range of the stations. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
We should replace planes with tie-fighters !!! | Dan Simper | Naval Aviation | 5 | February 6th 05 06:20 PM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 10 | November 3rd 03 11:49 PM |
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 22nd 03 09:41 AM |
best source to replace missing cowl fastener | Craig | Owning | 5 | August 25th 03 08:07 PM |