![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Hyslip" writes:
I am looking to purchase my first plane, and would like an early 80s Cessna 152. How much should I consider the fair market price for one in descent shape, that is ready to fly? Also, any idea how much insurance would be for a C152. I only have around 50 hours, a very new pilot, and I love it. The 152 is a great plane, from everything I've heard, but it's worth considering other options to make sure that you get what you want. Here are some considerations: 1. There are some four-seat planes, like the Piper Cherokee 140 and Beech Musketeer, that are in about the same price range as a 152 (both for buying and flying), but go faster and carry more. 2. Buying a used plane is often the cheapest part of ownership -- insurance, maintenance, fuel, parking, etc. will burn through a fair bit of money every year. If you are looking at a 152 because money is tight, you might want to get your feet wet with a partnership first, where you can share some fixed expenses. I started out looking for a Cessna 172 or similar, because that's what I trained it. I initially ruled out Cherokees right at the start because they have only a single door, and because I didn't know much about them. Fortunately, after trying out a Cardinal that I didn't like much, I happened to notice a Piper Cherokee Warrior II for sale, and looking at it in person got rid of most of my prejudices -- compared to the (fixed-gear) Cardinal I had just test flown, it had better avionics, better paint and interior, a higher useful load, faster airspeed, lower fuel burn, *and* a significantly lower price (precisely because everyone who trains in Cessnas wants to buy a Cessna, driving up the used prices). Now, with under 8 gph fuel burn at 75% power (8.5 gph by the POH) and roughly the same systems to maintain, the plane doesn't cost much more to operate than a 150/152, but it cruises much faster (well over 120 ktas) and with a full-fuel useful load around 650 lb, it can carry my whole family of four + luggage + dog. I'm not suggesting that a Cherokee is the right first plane for you just because it was for me, but I am suggesting that you not automatically buy the kind of plane you trained in. It's a big investment, so look around a while and make sure. Personally, I'm glad that I overcame my own initial prejudices against non-Cessnas. All the best, David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
Thanks for the advice, I will certainly look at some other make / model planes. It makes a lot of sense. I think a partnership would be the best way for me to start, but I haven't been able to find any in my area, so I decided to look at buying one myself. The Piper Cherokee Warrior you purchased sounds very useful. Right now I am looking for something to build time in, have fun, and work on my instrument rating. But, down the road something simliar to the Warrior is what I would like, with the good payload and speed, for a decent price. Thanks again. If anyone knows of partnerships forsale in the Raleigh, NC area, I would appreciate the info. Tom "David Megginson" wrote in message ... "Tom Hyslip" writes: I am looking to purchase my first plane, and would like an early 80s Cessna 152. How much should I consider the fair market price for one in descent shape, that is ready to fly? Also, any idea how much insurance would be for a C152. I only have around 50 hours, a very new pilot, and I love it. The 152 is a great plane, from everything I've heard, but it's worth considering other options to make sure that you get what you want. Here are some considerations: 1. There are some four-seat planes, like the Piper Cherokee 140 and Beech Musketeer, that are in about the same price range as a 152 (both for buying and flying), but go faster and carry more. 2. Buying a used plane is often the cheapest part of ownership -- insurance, maintenance, fuel, parking, etc. will burn through a fair bit of money every year. If you are looking at a 152 because money is tight, you might want to get your feet wet with a partnership first, where you can share some fixed expenses. I started out looking for a Cessna 172 or similar, because that's what I trained it. I initially ruled out Cherokees right at the start because they have only a single door, and because I didn't know much about them. Fortunately, after trying out a Cardinal that I didn't like much, I happened to notice a Piper Cherokee Warrior II for sale, and looking at it in person got rid of most of my prejudices -- compared to the (fixed-gear) Cardinal I had just test flown, it had better avionics, better paint and interior, a higher useful load, faster airspeed, lower fuel burn, *and* a significantly lower price (precisely because everyone who trains in Cessnas wants to buy a Cessna, driving up the used prices). Now, with under 8 gph fuel burn at 75% power (8.5 gph by the POH) and roughly the same systems to maintain, the plane doesn't cost much more to operate than a 150/152, but it cruises much faster (well over 120 ktas) and with a full-fuel useful load around 650 lb, it can carry my whole family of four + luggage + dog. I'm not suggesting that a Cherokee is the right first plane for you just because it was for me, but I am suggesting that you not automatically buy the kind of plane you trained in. It's a big investment, so look around a while and make sure. Personally, I'm glad that I overcame my own initial prejudices against non-Cessnas. All the best, David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Hyslip" writes:
I think a partnership would be the best way for me to start, but I haven't been able to find any in my area, so I decided to look at buying one myself. I ended up making the same choice -- I initially talked to someone interested in a partnership, but I was in more of a hurry than him. I think that the best kind of partnership would have been getting involved with a couple of people who were already experienced with owning. It is unbelievable how much there is to learn -- probably many, many times what we learn in groundschool. I've had some friendly AME's over the past year who have encouraged me to do some of the work on the plane myself (including an owner-assisted annual), but it's still been a cheap curve. The Piper Cherokee Warrior you purchased sounds very useful. Right now I am looking for something to build time in, have fun, and work on my instrument rating. But, down the road something simliar to the Warrior is what I would like, with the good payload and speed, for a decent price. It might be for sale in a few years as my kids get bigger and I need more load. Best of luck with the search. Since you live in a well-populated area, it might be a good idea to go around to local FBO's (say, within a two-hour drive) and get checked out on as many different types of rental planes as you can -- Cessnas, Pipers, Beechcraft, Katana's, etc. You never know what you'll fall in love with. All the best, David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 2-Nov-2003, "Tom Hyslip" wrote: I think a partnership would be the best way for me to start, but I haven't been able to find any in my area, so I decided to look at buying one myself. The Piper Cherokee Warrior you purchased sounds very useful. Right now I am looking for something to build time in, have fun, and work on my instrument rating. But, down the road something similar to the Warrior is what I would like, with the good payload and speed, for a decent price. Tom: The advantages and disadvantages of co-ownership ("partnership") arrangements have been discussed in many threads in this NG. You can find them using a Google Groups search. If you are planning to begin instrument training in the foreseeable future, you will certainly want to look for an airplane that is at least minimally equipped for IFR. The cost of adding equipment later will be far greater than the higher price of an already-equipped bird. You will probably find few 150/152s that are IFR equipped, and their small range and payload make them marginally suited for IFR at any rate. I think you should check out Cherokee 140s, a far more capable airplane than a 150/152 (in terms of payload, range, speed, and typical equipment level) for not much more money (purchase price and operating costs). -- -Elliott Drucker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 07:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 04 06:28 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 9th 04 03:47 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |