Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete?

"ArtP" wrote:
Just what about their safety record do you find so encouraging?


Nothing. The OP said they have atrocious safety records due to their
spin characteristics.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"ArtP" wrote:
Just what about their safety record do you find so encouraging?


Nothing. The OP said they have atrocious safety records due to their
spin characteristics.

Which is why the insurance is so high.

"Tom S." wrote:
Just what about their safety record do you find so
encouraging?

Nothing. The OP said they have atrocious safety records due
to their spin characteristics.

Which is why the insurance is so high.

Baloney.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Tom S." wrote:
Just what about their safety record do you find so
encouraging?

Nothing. The OP said they have atrocious safety records due
to their spin characteristics.

Which is why the insurance is so high.

Baloney.

That's nice, but that wasn't my comment, so please be a bit more careful in
snipping previous comments.

"Tom S." wrote:
Just what about their safety record do you find so
encouraging?

Nothing. The OP said they have atrocious safety records due
to their spin characteristics.

Which is why the insurance is so high.

Baloney.

That's nice, but that wasn't my comment, so please be a bit more
careful in
snipping previous comments.

Pardon me if I misunderstood. It seemed reasonable to conclude that you
were affirming that Cirrus insurance rates are high because "they have
atrocious safety records due to their spin characteristics," which is
baloney. Perhaps you meant something else.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM

"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...
"Tom S." wrote:
Just what about their safety record do you find so
encouraging?

Nothing. The OP said they have atrocious safety records due
to their spin characteristics.

Which is why the insurance is so high.

Baloney.

That's nice, but that wasn't my comment, so please be a bit more
careful in
snipping previous comments.

Pardon me if I misunderstood. It seemed reasonable to conclude that you
were affirming that Cirrus insurance rates are high because "they have
atrocious safety records due to their spin characteristics," which is
baloney. Perhaps you meant something else.

The whole PIECE wasn't me; I have no idea what Cirrus insurance rates are.
You snipped my response to which someone else added the comment about
insurance rates.

Since I don't fly my own plane, I don't know what either insurance rate
would be. I fly only our company planes and would have to ask the
controller what the insurance costs were. :~)

I'm looking to buy my own (first time) right after New Years, so it would be
interesting as my first choice right now is a F33A. However, if I was going
to go _new_, I'm thinking more Lancair rather than Cirrus.