A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th 03, 01:28 AM
Stu Gotts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I consider it more of a fun to fly airplane, the plastic one, whereas
the Bo's, although a delight, are more of a mission type. More useful
load, etc. Personal opinion of a Bonanza man. Not too sure about the
roomier claim. Sounds like the sicilian claims Mooney people have
when they say the backwards tailed wonders have only 4" less cabin
room than a Bonanza. Pure bull****!

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:11:38 -0600, "Dan Luke"
wrote:

"Stu Gotts" wrote:
For long CC's, a Bonanza is tops. For short hops (500 miles)
I'd sure like a Cirrus.


Why? The Cirrus is roomier than the Bo and has better designed seats.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.