A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Best Single Pilot IFR Plane



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 2nd 03, 10:11 PM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Citation CJ1!!

It ain't cheap, but it is the BEST.


  #2  
Old December 3rd 03, 12:30 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not even close to the best. I have a friend with part of one (Netjets
share) . With the two pilots and two average size passengers and a Labrador
it can't go from San Diego to Sun Valley without refueling in a modest
headwind if its warm. The problem is that at FL350 it will only go about
350kts and even a modest headwind at that altitude is well over 100kts. I
forget which engines the CJ1 uses but the engines in the CitationJet cycled
out pretty fast so if you weren't flying long legs the engines would cycle
out well before overhaul. Piaggio and Premier are much better.

Mike
MU-2

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

Citation CJ1!!

It ain't cheap, but it is the BEST.




  #3  
Old December 3rd 03, 06:13 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
news
Not even close to the best. I have a friend with part of one (Netjets
share) . With the two pilots and two average size passengers and a

Labrador
it can't go from San Diego to Sun Valley without refueling in a modest
headwind if its warm.


Wrong.

The problem is that at FL350 it will only go about
350kts and even a modest headwind at that altitude is well over 100kts.


At FL350, it does 371 to 385, depending on weight.

I
forget which engines the CJ1 uses but the engines in the CitationJet

cycled
out pretty fast so if you weren't flying long legs the engines would cycle
out well before overhaul.


Geez...since you're so omniscient, I think you'd know that data. The engines
in the CJ/CJ1 are VERY different from the old 500 series.

http://www.williams-int.com/product/1a.htm

Piaggio and Premier are much better.


One a vibrator, the other isn't SP certified.

Geez!!!


  #4  
Old December 3rd 03, 02:57 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
news
Not even close to the best. I have a friend with part of one (Netjets
share) . With the two pilots and two average size passengers and a

Labrador
it can't go from San Diego to Sun Valley without refueling in a modest
headwind if its warm.


Wrong.


It is a fact.


The problem is that at FL350 it will only go about
350kts and even a modest headwind at that altitude is well over 100kts.


At FL350, it does 371 to 385, depending on weight.

Its pretty obvious that you are getting your info from their marketing
materials and have never owned or flown a turbine plane. The Cessna
marketing data is all based on ISA temperatures and the real temperatures in
the US are ISA +10C to ISA +20C extracting a huge performance penalty.

I
forget which engines the CJ1 uses but the engines in the CitationJet

cycled
out pretty fast so if you weren't flying long legs the engines would

cycle
out well before overhaul.


Geez...since you're so omniscient, I think you'd know that data. The

engines
in the CJ/CJ1 are VERY different from the old 500 series.


Again you seem to be operating from total ignorance. The CitationJet uses
F44-1A engines


http://www.williams-int.com/product/1a.htm

Piaggio and Premier are much better.


One a vibrator,

The Avanti is considerably quieter than the CJ1/2


the other isn't SP certified.

It isn't? Check again

Mike
MU-2


  #5  
Old December 3rd 03, 09:45 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Piaggio Avanti P180 -

41,000 Feet

390 knots high speed Cruise - but normally about 360-365 at 330

Known Ice

Weather radar -

Pressurized to 4,000 feet w/ 9 psi max differential

1700 + nm Range w/ IFR reserves

Burns around 280/side at altitude (410)

We can do SF or L. Angeles to NJ non-stop with a nice tailwind...

Can land on a 2300 foot runway if you're good

Single Pilot Certified

Perfect safety record - Never an injury or fatality -

VERY VERY quiet with almost 6-foot headroom (ok, maybe 5'9" or so...but I',m
6'2" and never in the back)


Paul P


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Tom S." wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
news
Not even close to the best. I have a friend with part of one (Netjets
share) . With the two pilots and two average size passengers and a

Labrador
it can't go from San Diego to Sun Valley without refueling in a modest
headwind if its warm.


Wrong.


It is a fact.


The problem is that at FL350 it will only go about
350kts and even a modest headwind at that altitude is well over

100kts.

At FL350, it does 371 to 385, depending on weight.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
I wonder if Chris Thomas is a real pilot? Anybody know? Badwater Bill Home Built 116 September 3rd 04 05:43 PM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 October 1st 03 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 September 1st 03 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 August 1st 03 07:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.