![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote:
I inferred that the right thing to do might be to lower the prop speed to a minimum and ease back power as slowly as you can. Does that sound about right? How quickly can one expect to pull the throttle back and not risk shock cooling? If one must get down (say, for air traffic control reasons, or perhaps because one is trying to take advantage of favorable winds as long as possible), what is the best procedure. What about slipping it down? Does that risk the engine or the airframe at all? I've never done slips at cruise speeds (just on approach), so please forgive me if this is a naive question. What is the V-le for your airplane? If it's high enough, drop the gear and use them as speed brakes to get down while leaving some power on to keep the engine warm. Slipping is fine. There is considerable debate about the danger of shock cooling. Google these groups or see http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183094-1.html for more discussion. -- Dan C172RG at BFM (remove pants to reply by email) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
VLE is 129 KIAS...Cruise is around 140-150 KIAS. To avoid stess, I
would probably not drop gear until I was about 115 KIAS. Still, it is a good suggestion once I slow to that speed. Thanks. Sami Dan Luke wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I inferred that the right thing to do might be to lower the prop speed to a minimum and ease back power as slowly as you can. Does that sound about right? How quickly can one expect to pull the throttle back and not risk shock cooling? If one must get down (say, for air traffic control reasons, or perhaps because one is trying to take advantage of favorable winds as long as possible), what is the best procedure. What about slipping it down? Does that risk the engine or the airframe at all? I've never done slips at cruise speeds (just on approach), so please forgive me if this is a naive question. What is the V-le for your airplane? If it's high enough, drop the gear and use them as speed brakes to get down while leaving some power on to keep the engine warm. Slipping is fine. There is considerable debate about the danger of shock cooling. Google these groups or see http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183094-1.html for more discussion. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you wait till you slow down to 115 to drop the gear, you better start way
way the heck out, its hard to get it slowed down that much with the gear up. Especially if your up high. If your to fast, the gear wont come down, your red unsafe light will come on. once I hit 129 kts I pop the gear .. then you turn into a rock. "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: VLE is 129 KIAS...Cruise is around 140-150 KIAS. To avoid stess, I would probably not drop gear until I was about 115 KIAS. Still, it is a good suggestion once I slow to that speed. Thanks. Sami Dan Luke wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I inferred that the right thing to do might be to lower the prop speed to a minimum and ease back power as slowly as you can. Does that sound about right? How quickly can one expect to pull the throttle back and not risk shock cooling? If one must get down (say, for air traffic control reasons, or perhaps because one is trying to take advantage of favorable winds as long as possible), what is the best procedure. What about slipping it down? Does that risk the engine or the airframe at all? I've never done slips at cruise speeds (just on approach), so please forgive me if this is a naive question. What is the V-le for your airplane? If it's high enough, drop the gear and use them as speed brakes to get down while leaving some power on to keep the engine warm. Slipping is fine. There is considerable debate about the danger of shock cooling. Google these groups or see http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183094-1.html for more discussion. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read somewhere recently that making a habit of doing things like
dropping gear and flaps right at the edge of the allowed speed puts too much stress on them...so I was trying to be conservative. Since this is probably not a typical maneuver, I guess it makes sense to drop it right at 129. -Sami Jeff wrote: if you wait till you slow down to 115 to drop the gear, you better start way way the heck out, its hard to get it slowed down that much with the gear up. Especially if your up high. If your to fast, the gear wont come down, your red unsafe light will come on. once I hit 129 kts I pop the gear .. then you turn into a rock. "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: VLE is 129 KIAS...Cruise is around 140-150 KIAS. To avoid stess, I would probably not drop gear until I was about 115 KIAS. Still, it is a good suggestion once I slow to that speed. Thanks. Sami Dan Luke wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I inferred that the right thing to do might be to lower the prop speed to a minimum and ease back power as slowly as you can. Does that sound about right? How quickly can one expect to pull the throttle back and not risk shock cooling? If one must get down (say, for air traffic control reasons, or perhaps because one is trying to take advantage of favorable winds as long as possible), what is the best procedure. What about slipping it down? Does that risk the engine or the airframe at all? I've never done slips at cruise speeds (just on approach), so please forgive me if this is a naive question. What is the V-le for your airplane? If it's high enough, drop the gear and use them as speed brakes to get down while leaving some power on to keep the engine warm. Slipping is fine. There is considerable debate about the danger of shock cooling. Google these groups or see http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183094-1.html for more discussion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
once the gear comes down, your going to slow down in a few seconds. your also going
to start decending so you need to trim the airplane to how fast your wanting to decend. If you have taken to much power off to slow down to gear speed then you will need to be ready to add power once it comes down also. You will get the hang of it after a few times. BTW I also keep the auto extend off, most people I have talked to if theirs hasnt been disabled, put it on manual so you can get the gear up at a slower speed on take off and it dont fall out if you slow down to much. You will want to ask if your auto extend has been disabled or if it still works, There is a service bulletin on it I think. "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I read somewhere recently that making a habit of doing things like dropping gear and flaps right at the edge of the allowed speed puts too much stress on them...so I was trying to be conservative. Since this is probably not a typical maneuver, I guess it makes sense to drop it right at 129. -Sami Jeff wrote: if you wait till you slow down to 115 to drop the gear, you better start way way the heck out, its hard to get it slowed down that much with the gear up. Especially if your up high. If your to fast, the gear wont come down, your red unsafe light will come on. once I hit 129 kts I pop the gear .. then you turn into a rock. "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: VLE is 129 KIAS...Cruise is around 140-150 KIAS. To avoid stess, I would probably not drop gear until I was about 115 KIAS. Still, it is a good suggestion once I slow to that speed. Thanks. Sami Dan Luke wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I inferred that the right thing to do might be to lower the prop speed to a minimum and ease back power as slowly as you can. Does that sound about right? How quickly can one expect to pull the throttle back and not risk shock cooling? If one must get down (say, for air traffic control reasons, or perhaps because one is trying to take advantage of favorable winds as long as possible), what is the best procedure. What about slipping it down? Does that risk the engine or the airframe at all? I've never done slips at cruise speeds (just on approach), so please forgive me if this is a naive question. What is the V-le for your airplane? If it's high enough, drop the gear and use them as speed brakes to get down while leaving some power on to keep the engine warm. Slipping is fine. There is considerable debate about the danger of shock cooling. Google these groups or see http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183094-1.html for more discussion. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan, Thanks for the pointer. Even more appropriate, since we are
talking about a Turbo aircraft, is the AVWeb article. http://www.avweb.com/cgi-bin/udt/im....ry.id=1821 07 Very interesting article. One interesting thing about it is that the guy actually presents hard data to back up his claims (at least for his aircraft). -Sami Dan Luke wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I inferred that the right thing to do might be to lower the prop speed to a minimum and ease back power as slowly as you can. Does that sound about right? How quickly can one expect to pull the throttle back and not risk shock cooling? If one must get down (say, for air traffic control reasons, or perhaps because one is trying to take advantage of favorable winds as long as possible), what is the best procedure. What about slipping it down? Does that risk the engine or the airframe at all? I've never done slips at cruise speeds (just on approach), so please forgive me if this is a naive question. What is the V-le for your airplane? If it's high enough, drop the gear and use them as speed brakes to get down while leaving some power on to keep the engine warm. Slipping is fine. There is considerable debate about the danger of shock cooling. Google these groups or see http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/183094-1.html for more discussion. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
O.,
all the engine management columns by John Deakin are a must read. There are many more at Avweb. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas,
Thanks for the pointers. The articles are indeed quite good, but there is something I do not understand. It seems the whole theory on LOP operation is conditioned on having GAMI injectors, because the article implies that you can not do LOP operations on "normal" engines because of uneven fuel distribution causes roughness due to different cylinders outputing different powers when you start leaning past peak. Am I missing something here? What percentage of planes actually have GAMI injectors? -Sami Thomas Borchert wrote: O., all the engine management columns by John Deakin are a must read. There are many more at Avweb. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. The articles are indeed quite good, but there is something I do not understand. It seems the whole theory on LOP operation is conditioned on having GAMI injectors, because the article implies that you can not do LOP operations on "normal" engines because of uneven fuel distribution causes roughness due to different cylinders outputing different powers when you start leaning past peak. Am I missing something here? What percentage of planes actually have GAMI injectors? The 1997 Cessna 182S that is new to the club I am in flies LOP quite easily. To the best of my knowledge, this is a stock engine (not GAMI equipped). It is only advantagous to fly this way if you are flying LONG legs. The corresponding drop in cruise airspeed is not suited to short, fast trips. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... Thomas, Thanks for the pointers. The articles are indeed quite good, but there is something I do not understand. It seems the whole theory on LOP operation is conditioned on having GAMI injectors, because the article implies that you can not do LOP operations on "normal" engines because of uneven fuel distribution causes roughness due to different cylinders outputing different powers when you start leaning past peak. Am I missing something here? No, you're not. You're seeing a good example of just how sloppy the typical FI systems are. What percentage of planes actually have GAMI injectors? GAMI has sold about 7,000 sets of their GAMIjectors, so figure that against the entire fleet of FI engines; probably 5%. They cost less than $1000 a set, but most pilots will spend much more for other toys, never realizing the fuel cost savings they're missing and the damage they do to their engines (note how many planes need a top overhaul well before TBO). http://www.gami.com/gamijectors_order_form.html I'll be buying an F33A in the next few weeks, and damn sure it will have GAMI's installed before it goes anywhere. http://www.gami.com/gamibrochure.html (Also, I'm itching for a PRISM ignition system.) http://www.gami.com/prism.html HTH!! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|