![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:47:13 GMT, "James Blakely"
wrote: Is it just me, or is it that AOPA is starting to ignore the Spam-can pilot? I've been a member for about 5 years now and each year, the airplane they give away becomes more impractical. They claim the Waco is worth $200k but it is a day VFR only aircraft. How useful is that? Now, next year, they are giving away a twin. What percentage of pilots have a ME ticket? How many could get insurance? It is not just the airplanes either. I used to think that the AOPApilot magazine was one of the best. Now, almost half of it is dedicated to turbine operations. I do not see a turbine in my future at all. It really seems to me like AOPA is moving away from the weekend pilot and moving toward the semi-professional pilot. It seems to me that they are just supporting part 91 operations just because that is where most professional pilots get their start. So, what do you think? I think AOPA does an ok job of mixing GA interests, especially when considering the varied base of their constituents (private, commercial, ATP, light GA owners, heavy GA owners). I fly a Cherokee, and certainly enjoy the articles on latest/greatest avionics and planes. If you are looking for someting different - I find the type-specific magazines (Cessna Pilots Association, Cherokee Pilots Association, etc) to be good sources of spam-can info. As far as the WACO give-away, I think it is great. What a cool plane! If the pilot who wins doesn't like it, they can always trade/sell it for something of equivalent value. As others have already pointed out many pilots won't be able to afford the taxes on the plane, so they will have to sell no matter what. AOPA and flying have gone a bit overboard on the turbine operations sections, but I think this is being driven by the surge in the light jet industry, ie Eclipse, MustangJet, etc. It might be a fad, particularly if the 6-seat jet market never materializes. Regardless of what they put in their magazine, and what they give away - I do think AOPA does a good job of fighting against TFRs and other GA-oppressive legislation. They are our best hope against scandalous news reporting, and overzealous Congressmen. -Nathan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 95 | September 20th 04 02:07 AM |
BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA | Orval Fairbairn | General Aviation | 74 | September 18th 04 02:19 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |