A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Talk me out of this...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 04, 01:59 AM
Paul Folbrecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

THANKS a ton for all the responses. This place is great!

I have just read each and every line of each and every one of them and I
can say that at the moment I am certainly considerably less enthused
about this deal- I would say shying away from it, but I will do some
thinking.

I should have said a bit about my mission in the original post. It's
basically time-building with XC mostly within a 100 nm radius or so.
While a four-seater would definitely be nice, most of the time it will
be me & the girlfriend (she flew with me first time today and loved it)
with no real need for two more seats. I had actually been drawn to
150s/152s because of the fuel economy, but on second thought I can just
throttle back a 172 or Cherokee to 55% if I want to, right?

Performance is not a big concern right now. Although, after the flying
I did today (3.7 on the hobbs, fighting 40 knot headwinds part of the
trip), I can at least say I don't want to go any *slower* than a 152
does. :-)

I have to admit that I have not up to this point considered Pipers much
at all. I just certainly start looking that way as well, especially if
they do give more bang for the buck.

I guess the price is not really as good as I'd thought. I was figuring
it as $17,200 with the hangaring which did seem at least competitive.
And the rest of the plane is indeed in good shape. But- to those who
pointed to the fact that it's been a trainer- I hear ya. That does
bother me. I have seen what students do to airplanes and 25 years is a
long time!

In short, I definitely won't be doing anything soon and my feeling is
that I will likely pass this one by, or possibly make them an offer
considerably below asking.

~Paul
  #2  
Old February 9th 04, 06:00 PM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If fuel economy is your goal, then let me do some math for you.

Let's presume you want to put, oh, say 500 hours on this rascal before you trade
up. Let's also presume you go at 6 gallons/hour. This means that in 500 hours
you will burn about 3000 gallons of fuel.

In a 150, you can burn autogas at $1.50 a gallon for a total cost of $4500.

In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500.

Factor the extra $3 grand into your equation.

Jim


Paul Folbrecht
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

I had actually been drawn to
-150s/152s because of the fuel economy

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
  #3  
Old February 9th 04, 06:13 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jim Weir wrote:

In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500.


Or you can get an auto gas STC from either Petersen or the EAA. The EAA page notes
that modifications to the engine are required; even so, it's going to be cheaper
than running avgas.

George Patterson
Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable
either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances
under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more
often to the physician than to the patient.
  #4  
Old February 9th 04, 06:15 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Weir" wrote in message ...

In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500.

I believe both the EAA and Petersen have the STC for the 152/O-235. I believe
Petersen requires 91 Octane in this application.

  #5  
Old February 10th 04, 02:51 AM
Paul Folbrecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But I can't seem to get autogas at most airports.

Jim Weir wrote:

If fuel economy is your goal, then let me do some math for you.

Let's presume you want to put, oh, say 500 hours on this rascal before you trade
up. Let's also presume you go at 6 gallons/hour. This means that in 500 hours
you will burn about 3000 gallons of fuel.

In a 150, you can burn autogas at $1.50 a gallon for a total cost of $4500.

In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500.

Factor the extra $3 grand into your equation.

Jim


Paul Folbrecht
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

I had actually been drawn to
-150s/152s because of the fuel economy

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

  #6  
Old February 10th 04, 04:16 AM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay, come in here and teach this foundling about the Grapes of
Wrath.

Jim



Paul Folbrecht
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-But I can't seem to get autogas at most airports.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want to talk with Eggenfellner customers Ed Wischmeyer Home Built 3 December 19th 04 04:20 PM
Radio talk in the UK Paul General Aviation 36 March 8th 04 10:57 PM
Can we talk about the Randolph problem? Michael Horowitz Home Built 5 October 30th 03 04:44 PM
Thunderbirds members to talk about flight history Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 20th 03 04:13 AM
crazy talk - 320 into a 360 application? [email protected] Owning 1 August 6th 03 03:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.