![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
THANKS a ton for all the responses. This place is great!
I have just read each and every line of each and every one of them and I can say that at the moment I am certainly considerably less enthused about this deal- I would say shying away from it, but I will do some thinking. I should have said a bit about my mission in the original post. It's basically time-building with XC mostly within a 100 nm radius or so. While a four-seater would definitely be nice, most of the time it will be me & the girlfriend (she flew with me first time today and loved it) with no real need for two more seats. I had actually been drawn to 150s/152s because of the fuel economy, but on second thought I can just throttle back a 172 or Cherokee to 55% if I want to, right? Performance is not a big concern right now. Although, after the flying I did today (3.7 on the hobbs, fighting 40 knot headwinds part of the trip), I can at least say I don't want to go any *slower* than a 152 does. :-) I have to admit that I have not up to this point considered Pipers much at all. I just certainly start looking that way as well, especially if they do give more bang for the buck. I guess the price is not really as good as I'd thought. I was figuring it as $17,200 with the hangaring which did seem at least competitive. And the rest of the plane is indeed in good shape. But- to those who pointed to the fact that it's been a trainer- I hear ya. That does bother me. I have seen what students do to airplanes and 25 years is a long time! In short, I definitely won't be doing anything soon and my feeling is that I will likely pass this one by, or possibly make them an offer considerably below asking. ~Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If fuel economy is your goal, then let me do some math for you.
Let's presume you want to put, oh, say 500 hours on this rascal before you trade up. Let's also presume you go at 6 gallons/hour. This means that in 500 hours you will burn about 3000 gallons of fuel. In a 150, you can burn autogas at $1.50 a gallon for a total cost of $4500. In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500. Factor the extra $3 grand into your equation. Jim Paul Folbrecht shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: I had actually been drawn to -150s/152s because of the fuel economy Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Weir wrote: In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500. Or you can get an auto gas STC from either Petersen or the EAA. The EAA page notes that modifications to the engine are required; even so, it's going to be cheaper than running avgas. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Weir" wrote in message ... In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500. I believe both the EAA and Petersen have the STC for the 152/O-235. I believe Petersen requires 91 Octane in this application. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But I can't seem to get autogas at most airports.
Jim Weir wrote: If fuel economy is your goal, then let me do some math for you. Let's presume you want to put, oh, say 500 hours on this rascal before you trade up. Let's also presume you go at 6 gallons/hour. This means that in 500 hours you will burn about 3000 gallons of fuel. In a 150, you can burn autogas at $1.50 a gallon for a total cost of $4500. In a 152 you have to burn 100(LL) at $2.50 a gallon for a total cost of $7500. Factor the extra $3 grand into your equation. Jim Paul Folbrecht shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: I had actually been drawn to -150s/152s because of the fuel economy Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay, come in here and teach this foundling about the Grapes of
Wrath. Jim Paul Folbrecht shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -But I can't seem to get autogas at most airports. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Want to talk with Eggenfellner customers | Ed Wischmeyer | Home Built | 3 | December 19th 04 04:20 PM |
Radio talk in the UK | Paul | General Aviation | 36 | March 8th 04 10:57 PM |
Can we talk about the Randolph problem? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 5 | October 30th 03 04:44 PM |
Thunderbirds members to talk about flight history | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 20th 03 04:13 AM |
crazy talk - 320 into a 360 application? | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | August 6th 03 03:32 PM |