A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stop the noise



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 28th 04, 07:56 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Noel" wrote in message
...
The guy makes some legitimate points. Most of us would not want an
aerobatic box over our neighborhood either. The pilots involved should

work
out some kind of compromise with the affected homeowners or find a less
sensitive area to practice over. This is starting to sound like an NRA

vs.
gun control controversy where ANY type of control is considered bad

because
of fear of setting a precedent, so that sensible controls are not

possible.


You are quite right, but at this point a compromise is not likely. Neither
is it likely that pilots will find a less sensitive area to practice over.
If you think you know of such an area the pilots would certainly be
interested in knowing about it. I am sure that whoever lives in the less
sensitive area will greatly appreciate your efforts, too.

The real problem lies in concentrating all this activity in a small area in
the first place -- probably at the insistence of those affected by noise.
Concentrating it still further is unlikely to improve the situation.

A better approach might be to get rid of aerobatic boxes entirely and let
pilots practice where they want. That would spread the noise out over a
larger area and be less objectionable over all.

No one is saying that there should be no control whatsoever. What many of us
are saying is that the controls we have in place are at best ineffective and
at worst actually make the problem worse. Since you seem to think that
sensible controls are possible, perhaps you would be so kind as to enlighten
the rest of us as to what those sensible controls might be. Then we can have
a sensible debate about whether those sensible controls are really as
sensible as you think they are.


  #2  
Old March 28th 04, 09:03 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Mike Noel" wrote in message
...
The guy makes some legitimate points. Most of us would not want an
aerobatic box over our neighborhood either. The pilots involved should

work
out some kind of compromise with the affected homeowners or find a less
sensitive area to practice over. This is starting to sound like an NRA

vs.
gun control controversy where ANY type of control is considered bad

because
of fear of setting a precedent, so that sensible controls are not

possible.


You are quite right, but at this point a compromise is not likely.


Then the pilots will lose.


  #3  
Old March 29th 04, 01:05 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


You are quite right, but at this point a compromise is not likely.


Then the pilots will lose.



We may finally agree on something there. Unfortunately, I don't see what
more the pilots can do.


  #4  
Old March 29th 04, 06:40 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


You are quite right, but at this point a compromise is not likely.


Then the pilots will lose.


We may finally agree on something there. Unfortunately, I don't see what
more the pilots can do.


The attitude of your previous posts is the opposite of waht is needed. Just
giving people the impression that you care about their noise concerns will
help. You have to remember that in a class warfare society airplane owners
are already the evil rich and right now the TSA wants small GA gone.


  #5  
Old March 29th 04, 04:41 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


You are quite right, but at this point a compromise is not likely.

Then the pilots will lose.


We may finally agree on something there. Unfortunately, I don't see what
more the pilots can do.


The attitude of your previous posts is the opposite of waht is needed.

Just
giving people the impression that you care about their noise concerns will
help.


Apparently you are the only person in the whole world that has the
impression that I do not care about noise concerns. How you got that
impression was through deliberately misrepresenting what I said.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Small plane noise is destroying my life Robert Morien General Aviation 5 December 1st 04 05:01 PM
Stop the noise airads Aerobatics 131 July 2nd 04 01:28 PM
Stop the noise airads General Aviation 88 July 2nd 04 01:28 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 3 October 1st 03 05:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.