![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Thompson wrote:
Now, how are you going to pay your lawyer in that lawsuit? Job prospects for quadraplegics are pretty dismal. First, your presuming I'm broke to begin with and that my income stops with the accident. Neither is necessarily true. The argument for "increasing access to the courts" is commonly used to rationalize contingency fees. Does this increase in suits result in a net-net greater good for society? I don't think so. While, on one hand contingency allows someone with little money to file a suit and possible receive a huge award, on the other, *someone else* is paying that award whether it is reasonable or not. How can a jury determine the "appropriate" punitive damage amount? These costs are passed on to society. Does society in the U.S. benefit more from this trade off than in Japan or England? I'm not an expert on this but I think the crimes of "maintenance" and "champerty" went back to biblical times. Contingency seems to be the combination of these two. If not eliminated perhaps Contingency should be limited to "maintenance" by allowing the lawyer to recover his costs from the spoils but not profit from them (champerty). A slippery slope to be on though... And that's great you like the loser pays theory. What if you lose? What if the product wasn't defective after all? How are you (the loser) going to pay? What if, at the end, you can't pay? I think you more eloquently state my argument than me. Clearly, as done in much of the rest of the world, the prospective plaintiff had to consider a potential down side as well as a possible up side then a better balance would be achieved. Should you be required to prove you could pay if you lost, before you even were allowed to file a lawsuit? Interesting question. In most states you have to prove you have insurance or deep pockets to license a car because you are creating a potential liability by putting that car on the road. When you file a suit you create a potential liability as well. But, my position depends on more personal responsibility that most Americans have the stomach for so I doubt things will change. Fewer and fewer companies will make risky products (like vacuum pumps) and your daughter may not have access to a doctor to deliver her child. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 12th 04 03:03 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | General Aviation | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
September issue of Afterburner now on line | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:13 PM |