![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You are definitely asking the right questions about the twins. And you are right to be asking here before getting out your checkbook. In the traditional r.a.owning way - keep asking the questions and we'll keep saying you can't afford it until you're stuck on the ground. Yeah, a while back I was asking about a favorite plane of mine, the T210, and they were close to having me talked out of buying it, or anything else. The dream to fly and own is persistant, though. Seriously though, $20-30k for 100hrs/year works out to $200-300/hr. It is impossible to own/operate a 421 for $200/hr. The GTSIO520s burn 25gph (each) in cruise. Given the $3/gallon prices we have in Chicago - that's $150/hr right there. A 421 is almost certainly more plane than I need. The 340 is probably closer to the truth, but is more crampt than the 414. If I can find a 414 that I can afford, both on the front and back end, then that might be the bird. Assuming, of course, that wing spar AD doesn't kill all 300/400 Cessnas. So a rough estimate per hour Fuel: $150 Oil: $6 Eng Reserve: $45 Tiedown $6 Insurance: $100 ------------------------------------ That's close to $300 and it does not include annual inspections or misc maintenance costs. Thanks for the writeup. This kind of stuff is invaluable in helping the decision process. John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john szpara" wrote in message s.com... You are definitely asking the right questions about the twins. And you are right to be asking here before getting out your checkbook. In the traditional r.a.owning way - keep asking the questions and we'll keep saying you can't afford it until you're stuck on the ground. Yeah, a while back I was asking about a favorite plane of mine, the T210, and they were close to having me talked out of buying it, or anything else. The dream to fly and own is persistant, though. Seriously, don't let anybody talk you out of doing what you want to do because you will regret it. I think most of the posters here are just trying to make sure that you think of all the angles. I am seriously thinking of getting rid of my current airplane in the next few years for many of the reasons that have been brought up. Going to Simcom is a minimium of four days and $15,000. Going in for maitenance is two days just to drop off the airplane and pick it up again. There is no way that I save SIX DAYS a year by owning an airplane. I don't fly around anymore just to look out the window. My plan is to build a Murphy Moose (6 place bushplane) that can be maintained by myself and where I can get training locally. I would also save well over $100k/yr in expenses. I can find the time and I can afford the price but I am reaching the point where I ask myself if I really want to. Once you cross a certain threshold of airplane performance, the commitment, both in term of time and money starts growing geometrically. Mike MU-2 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 04:35:56 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote: Interesting. The *only* reason I fly is to enjoy the view out the window (to the tune of 200+ hours per year), and to transport myself to (relatively local) places I've never been before, or to go places you can only get to with an airplane (most of which, you can only get to with a "bush" airplane). I own a simple/old tail-dragger now, but in earlier days, I used to long for high/fast stuff (the more complex, the better, although I've never had the pleasure of flying equipment like you're airplane Mike). These days, something like a Champ on a summer day at 800' AGL putting along at 85-90mph is my idea of fun. If I need to get across the country in a hurry, I hop onto a tube (airliner). The Murphy Moose is a neat rig. If I were to build one, I'd have to hang/use the M-14PF (400hp) engine. Bela P. Havasreti "john szpara" wrote in message ws.com... You are definitely asking the right questions about the twins. And you are right to be asking here before getting out your checkbook. In the traditional r.a.owning way - keep asking the questions and we'll keep saying you can't afford it until you're stuck on the ground. Yeah, a while back I was asking about a favorite plane of mine, the T210, and they were close to having me talked out of buying it, or anything else. The dream to fly and own is persistant, though. Seriously, don't let anybody talk you out of doing what you want to do because you will regret it. I think most of the posters here are just trying to make sure that you think of all the angles. I am seriously thinking of getting rid of my current airplane in the next few years for many of the reasons that have been brought up. Going to Simcom is a minimium of four days and $15,000. Going in for maitenance is two days just to drop off the airplane and pick it up again. There is no way that I save SIX DAYS a year by owning an airplane. I don't fly around anymore just to look out the window. My plan is to build a Murphy Moose (6 place bushplane) that can be maintained by myself and where I can get training locally. I would also save well over $100k/yr in expenses. I can find the time and I can afford the price but I am reaching the point where I ask myself if I really want to. Once you cross a certain threshold of airplane performance, the commitment, both in term of time and money starts growing geometrically. Mike MU-2 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net,
Mike Rapoport wrote: I don't fly around anymore just to look out the window. [...] I would also save well over $100k/yr in expenses. Sounds like you need a helicopter! -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am seriously thinking of getting rid of my current airplane in the next
few years for many of the reasons that have been brought up. Going to Simcom is a minimium of four days and $15,000. Going in for maitenance is two days just to drop off the airplane and pick it up again. There is no way that I save SIX DAYS a year by owning an airplane. I don't fly around I read an article that you can do Flightsafety sim training for something like $4500 (or so) a year, and go as many times as you want/need. That's a twin simulator, and the writer of the article raved about the quality of the sim and the training. John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is true...for the course only. I have to get there which is a 4000+nm
round trip which takes 15+ flight hours at $600+/hr. Then there in another $1-2,000 for hotels, maeals, rental car over the four days. We haven't allocated anything for my time yet either. Mike MU-2 "john szpara" wrote in message s.com... I am seriously thinking of getting rid of my current airplane in the next few years for many of the reasons that have been brought up. Going to Simcom is a minimium of four days and $15,000. Going in for maitenance is two days just to drop off the airplane and pick it up again. There is no way that I save SIX DAYS a year by owning an airplane. I don't fly around I read an article that you can do Flightsafety sim training for something like $4500 (or so) a year, and go as many times as you want/need. That's a twin simulator, and the writer of the article raved about the quality of the sim and the training. John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:33:50 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote: That is true...for the course only. I have to get there which is a 4000+nm round trip which takes 15+ flight hours at $600+/hr. Then there in another $1-2,000 for hotels, maeals, rental car over the four days. We haven't allocated anything for my time yet either. I thought they have more than one location, Long Beach and Wichita? If they have one in Long Beach, that's only 1.5 hours by 300-400 series cessna for me (and good practice, to boot). Where are you located? John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john szpara" wrote in message s.com... On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:33:50 GMT, "Mike Rapoport" wrote: That is true...for the course only. I have to get there which is a 4000+nm round trip which takes 15+ flight hours at $600+/hr. Then there in another $1-2,000 for hotels, maeals, rental car over the four days. We haven't allocated anything for my time yet either. I thought they have more than one location, Long Beach and Wichita? If they have one in Long Beach, that's only 1.5 hours by 300-400 series cessna for me (and good practice, to boot). Where are you located? John Szpara Affordable Satellite Fiero Owner 2-84 Indy Pace cars, 86 Coupe, 88 Formula 3.4, 88 Coupe, 88GT Location is the heart of my problem. I am in the Northwest (Idaho) and the only simulator is in the Southeast (Orlando) so it is about the worst possible situation. If the sim was only 1.5hrs away from you then it is an entirely different situation. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|