![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote
I have heard of other stories like this and they have always been in reference to planes which just changed hands or planes which were known to have deferred maintenance. I think you've nailed it. In fact, the three cases I know of all involved the delivery flight after purchse on a 'great deal.' Perhaps there are no 'great deals' in the used airplane market? Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael" wrote in message
om... I think you've nailed it. In fact, the three cases I know of all involved the delivery flight after purchse on a 'great deal.' Perhaps there are no 'great deals' in the used airplane market? Correct... Rationally thinking there never should be a "great deal" in a used airplane market -- at least for an airworthy airplane. Great deals in other markets (i.e. real estate) generally occur due to local abberations in supply and demand. An airworthy airplane is the ULTIMATE mobile asset and thus its price should be determined on a much more broad geographic market. The only reason I can consider for an airplane to sell below its market value would be if the seller needs to sell it quickly. With interest rates as low as they are, it clearly makes sense to hold an airplane for 3-6 months if necessary to get its market value. The only real reason to sell below market value would be if the owner is so leveraged that he can no longer hold that loan on the airplane -- if that is the case, then the odds are extremely high that he also has not been in an economic position to properly maintain the airplane. So as I see it, there is no reason to get a "good deal" on an airworthy airplane sold in an arms-length transaction. The only "good deal" would be for an unairworthy/project airplane or a transaction among friends rather than on the open market. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message om... involved the delivery flight after purchse on a 'great deal.' Perhaps there are no 'great deals' in the used airplane market? Correct... Rationally thinking there never should be a "great deal" in a used airplane market -- at least for an airworthy airplane. Great deals in other markets (i.e. real estate) generally occur due to local abberations in supply and demand. An airworthy airplane is the ULTIMATE mobile asset and thus its price should be determined on a much more broad geographic market. The only reason I can consider for an airplane to sell below its market value would be if the seller needs to sell it quickly. With interest rates as low as they are, it clearly makes sense to hold an airplane for 3-6 months if necessary to get its market value. The only real reason to sell below market value would be if the owner is so leveraged that he can no longer hold that loan on the airplane -- if that is the case, then the odds are extremely high that he also has not been in an economic position to properly maintain the airplane. So as I see it, there is no reason to get a "good deal" on an airworthy airplane sold in an arms-length transaction. The only "good deal" would be for an unairworthy/project airplane or a transaction among friends rather than on the open market. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Kaplan" wrote
The only reason I can consider for an airplane to sell below its market value would be if the seller needs to sell it quickly. Bingo. That's the case with the last such incident I had in mind. The only real reason to sell below market value would be if the owner is so leveraged that he can no longer hold that loan on the airplane Right again. if that is the case, then the odds are extremely high that he also has not been in an economic position to properly maintain the airplane. Which is what I told the buyer. He inspected the airplane (half a day for a twin of make and model he has never owned or maintained) and pronounced it to be in good shape. The failures occurred as he flew it home. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT but good..the death of Mr Common | BllFs6 | Home Built | 0 | August 25th 04 03:01 AM |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |
Germany Lost the War... So What? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 55 | February 26th 04 08:51 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |