![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg,
Ya, but I thought we were talking about a Cirrus and not a Bonanza. And, I think the point remains. We were comparing the Cirrus to "conventional" aircraft, and some were implying the older ones were no problem to recover at altitudes below 910 feet, while the Cirrus would be a problem. Turns out that the 910 feet are needed to recover from a one-turn spin (as certification requires) for the Cirrus. Well, I doubt you'd get away with much less in any comparable aircraft, e.g. the Bonanza. And in that case, that point does NOT remain. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:28:36 +0200, Thomas Borchert wrote:
aircraft, e.g. the Bonanza. And in that case, that point does NOT remain. Yes, yes. I read the thread. I guess I don't understand why the point doesn't remain and why the rest of my post was ignored. Did I not explain my self very well? Especially in light of the fact that I asked questions which, in my mind, directly relate to the validity of the comparison. Furthermore, I offered that it's a corner case that really doesn't matter. Especially if I'm right about CAPS, as explained. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
New Cirrus SR22 Lead Time | Lenny Sawyer | Owning | 4 | March 6th 04 09:22 AM |
Fractional Ownership - Cirrus SR22 | Rich Raine | Owning | 3 | December 24th 03 05:36 AM |
New Cessna panel | C J Campbell | Owning | 48 | October 24th 03 04:43 PM |