Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed.

Greg,

Ya, but I thought we were talking about a Cirrus and not a Bonanza. And,
I think the point remains.


We were comparing the Cirrus to "conventional" aircraft, and some were
implying the older ones were no problem to recover at altitudes below 910
feet, while the Cirrus would be a problem. Turns out that the 910 feet are
needed to recover from a one-turn spin (as certification requires) for the
Cirrus. Well, I doubt you'd get away with much less in any comparable
aircraft, e.g. the Bonanza. And in that case, that point does NOT remain.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:28:36 +0200, Thomas Borchert wrote:

aircraft, e.g. the Bonanza. And in that case, that point does NOT remain.

Yes, yes. I read the thread. I guess I don't understand why the point
doesn't remain and why the rest of my post was ignored. Did I not explain
my self very well? Especially in light of the fact that I asked questions
which, in my mind, directly relate to the validity of the comparison.
Furthermore, I offered that it's a corner case that really doesn't matter.
Especially if I'm right about CAPS, as explained.