![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 03:39:20 +0000, Dave Stadt wrote:
Not to mention reaction time which would add hundreds of feet to the equation. And that assumes you didn't waste time trying to recover in the first place. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So now we come back to some of the points I made early on in this thread...
One of the problems is getting the pilot to absolutely ignore both human nature and his training and immediately deploy the BRS with no attempt at recovery from the spin. Because if the pilot doesn't follow this procedure, no questions asked, the delay resulting from going through a recovery process and the associated thought processes may well put the pilot below the effective altitude of the BRS. You're working against both existing training and instincts, and Cirrus-specific training that simply tells a pilot about the specific characteristics of the airplane is useless. The training needs to absolutely pound these differences into the pilot's head. And until that type of training is done the Cirrus will continue to have a less-than-stellar accident record... "Greg Copeland" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 03:39:20 +0000, Dave Stadt wrote: Not to mention reaction time which would add hundreds of feet to the equation. And that assumes you didn't waste time trying to recover in the first place. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... So now we come back to some of the points I made early on in this thread... One of the problems is getting the pilot to absolutely ignore both human nature and his training and immediately deploy the BRS with no attempt at recovery from the spin. snip...And until that type of training is done the Cirrus will continue to have a less-than-stellar accident record... And to come back to a point I made earlier in the thread, the result of pulling the BRS *is* an accident. You will end up with bent metal and possibly injuries every time you deploy the rescue system, and this reality will be reflected in the Cirrus's insurance rates. Hopefully, the Cirrus will some day have a low fatality rate, but I doubt if it will ever be known for a low accident rate. Vaughn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... So now we come back to some of the points I made early on in this thread... One of the problems is getting the pilot to absolutely ignore both human nature and his training and immediately deploy the BRS with no attempt at recovery from the spin. Because if the pilot doesn't follow this procedure, no questions asked, the delay resulting from going through a recovery process and the associated thought processes may well put the pilot below the effective altitude of the BRS. You're working against both existing training and instincts, and Cirrus-specific training that simply tells a pilot about the specific characteristics of the airplane is useless. The training needs to absolutely pound these differences into the pilot's head. And until that type of training is done the Cirrus will continue to have a less-than-stellar accident record... Can you imagine what a pilot that flies a Cirrus and other planes would do in a crisis situation. Two totally different emergency procedures would vie for top priority. Scary. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
New Cirrus SR22 Lead Time | Lenny Sawyer | Owning | 4 | March 6th 04 09:22 AM |
Fractional Ownership - Cirrus SR22 | Rich Raine | Owning | 3 | December 24th 03 05:36 AM |
New Cessna panel | C J Campbell | Owning | 48 | October 24th 03 04:43 PM |