A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

third seatbelt in 172



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 15th 04, 03:27 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Newps wrote:

"Charles Felton" wrote in message
news:kyepc.51476$iF6.4672953@attbi_s02...
Hard to find, but Cessna 205 is cheaper than 210 or 206.


You don't want a 205. Only got 260 hp and has the 182 wing.


It's a tri-gear version of the 185. Has the 185 wing and engine. Wingspan is 8"
greater than the 182.

Weighs more than a 182.


True.

Gets outperformed by a 182.


It's faster, climbs better, and can haul more than a 182. The 185, on the other hand,
will beat it.

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.
  #2  
Old May 15th 04, 04:03 AM
bubba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The early 182's are used for hauling skydivers and have been approved
for 5 jumpers with a pilot. Thats 6 people in a 182.
I've seen 7 people in a 182 with a 300lb pilot, now thats another story.

The seats have been removed to provide space and reduce weight.
Since the aircraft has been approved for 5 skydivers, you might be able
to get it approved for 5 people as long as you don't go out of the CG
envelope and have seat belts for each passenger.

Dave



G.R. Patterson III wrote:

Newps wrote:

"Charles Felton" wrote in message
news:kyepc.51476$iF6.4672953@attbi_s02...

Hard to find, but Cessna 205 is cheaper than 210 or 206.


You don't want a 205. Only got 260 hp and has the 182 wing.



It's a tri-gear version of the 185. Has the 185 wing and engine. Wingspan is 8"
greater than the 182.


Weighs more than a 182.



True.


Gets outperformed by a 182.



It's faster, climbs better, and can haul more than a 182. The 185, on the other hand,
will beat it.

George Patterson
I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in.


  #3  
Old May 15th 04, 04:53 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"bubba" wrote in message
news:iMfpc.4135$qA.469368@attbi_s51...


The seats have been removed to provide space and reduce weight.
Since the aircraft has been approved for 5 skydivers, you might be able
to get it approved for 5 people as long as you don't go out of the CG
envelope and have seat belts for each passenger.


Never happen. Been tried, thousands of times. CG isn't really a factor in
the 182.


  #4  
Old May 15th 04, 04:52 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...

You don't want a 205. Only got 260 hp and has the 182 wing.


It's a tri-gear version of the 185.


They only used the 185 for one year in developing the 205. Then they used
the 210 to make the 205. The 205 is more properly a derivative of a 210, it
is on the 210 type certificate and was built using the same jigs.


Has the 185 wing and engine.

Like I said, 260 hp.



Wingspan is 8"
greater than the 182.


It's the same wing.



Weighs more than a 182.


True.



Gets outperformed by a 182.


It's faster,


It's the same speed or slower. Although we're only talking a few knots.


climbs better,

Climbs worse when at gross. Has to, weighs too damn much. Has worse
takeoff performance, has to, too damn heavy for the power. Same wing as a
182 and only 30 more hp to lift 500-700 more pounds.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.