Major Overhaul

"Gene Kearns" writes:

On 07 Jun 2004 07:30:14 -0700, Javier Henderson
wrote:

"John Kunkel" writes:

And then you get into the old argument about the word "major" and whether
the use of that word constitutes a major repair needing a 337.

Since when a 337 is required for a major repair?


Since almost forever. See FAR 43 Appendix B....
http://tinyurl.com/ytakf

Interesting. Thanks for the URL.

But, if I read it correctly, paragraph (b) tells that the form is not
needed if the repairs are made IAW manual or specs acceptable to the
administrator. Presumably, the overhaul manual is a manul or spec
acceptable to the admin?

-jav

That is ONLY for a certified repair station (part 145)

But, if I read it correctly, paragraph (b) tells that the form is not
needed if the repairs are made IAW manual or specs acceptable to the
administrator. Presumably, the overhaul manual is a manul or spec
acceptable to the admin?

ospam (JohnN3TWN) writes:

But, if I read it correctly, paragraph (b) tells that the form is not
needed if the repairs are made IAW manual or specs acceptable to the
administrator. Presumably, the overhaul manual is a manul or spec
acceptable to the admin?

That is ONLY for a certified repair station (part 145)


I'm now starting to get a headache.

-jav