![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marty from Sunny Florida" wrote in message ...
From what I've read on this NG, the Lycoming engine is a better choice in terms of hours to Major Overhaul. A Continental engine with Millenium cylinders makes the engine less likely to fail. All things equal, including the price, what is considered a better buy, the 150 or 152? Presume they're one model year apart and equally equipped. Advice and opinions, please. The 152s seem to carry a premium on the price tag (5K+). They have a longer TBO, but are also more expensive to overhaul. If I were looking for a personal aircraft, I wouldn't pay the premium for the 152. It really doesn't have any significant improvements over the 150. One thing, though. The 150's O-200 is more susceptible to carb icing. It's not really a huge safety issue if you know what to expect and take corrective action. After 50 hrs. or so it becomes second nature to hit the carb heat at the first hint of roughness. Problem solved. This is, of course, a theoretical discussion. The chances that you'll find a 150 and a 152 in exactly the same condition and equipped exactly alike are slim. In real life, you should by the one that is in the best condition and equipped the way you want. If you are in the market for a two seat Cessna, don't limit yourself to one model or another. Just get the best plane for your money. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One thing, though. The 150's O-200 is more susceptible to carb
icing. It's not really a huge safety issue if you know what to expect and take corrective action. After 50 hrs. or so it becomes second nature to hit the carb heat at the first hint of roughness. Problem solved. This is, of course, a theoretical discussion. Exactly. My 150 carries my 220 lb person just fine, and a smaller person without a problem. Even in clouds or heavy haze, I've never encountered carb ice. I still check for it, but it's not there on this engine. Some of the Connies in the 150 tend to be ice-makers, but apparently not mine (so far). We chose a '67 G model because that's the first year they bowed the doors out and gave you and inch or two extra elbow room. Good luck. Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 73 | June 25th 04 04:53 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |