Complex / High Performance / Low Performance

"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:hL6Ec.5949$z81.3182@fed1read01...
I was thinking the C172RG I used to fly had a controllable prop... mmmm

yep... sure enough.. here's the old UND check list complete with Prop
cycles
on the before takeoff checks.. and MP/RPM for cruise settings.. I can't
find the reference, but it might have been 180HP..

so it would be Complex, but not High Performance.. C 172RG, Cutlass.. it
was
a sweet flying Skyhawk.. did not cruise like a standard gear dragger..

I was at GFK when UND still had the Cessna's. What years were you there?

so it would be Complex, but not High Performance.. C 172RG, Cutlass.. it
was
a sweet flying Skyhawk.. did not cruise like a standard gear dragger..

I was at GFK when UND still had the Cessna's. What years were you there?


I was in GFK.. actually KRDR... from 1988-1991. The local FBO would lease
out the UND Cutlass's to renter pilots.. just schedule one and the FBO would
make sure there was one on his ramp from UND. It was a nice plane.. for a
172.. and it had the RNAV system in it.

BT

"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:eMmEc.7250$z81.6499@fed1read01...
so it would be Complex, but not High Performance.. C 172RG, Cutlass..
it
was
a sweet flying Skyhawk.. did not cruise like a standard gear dragger..

I was at GFK when UND still had the Cessna's. What years were you
there?


I was in GFK.. actually KRDR... from 1988-1991.

I was at GFK from 3/89-12/92.