![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Mike, I'm surprised there isn't more interest in the diesel version in the US. What percentage of DA40s sold in Europe are diesel vs. gas? It is not offered in the US. Simple as that. It is not certified here, either. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C,
It is not offered in the US. Simple as that. It is not certified here, either. Don't be a smarta.. Why certify something that isn't sold? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is really frustrating, as a consumer, to see cars and planes sold abroad
with the latest technology, getting 30% better fuel economy, and the same products are not available here, because the manufacturers have the attitude that US consumers don't care about fuel efficiency. When you look at the increased range and payload possible with the DA40 with a diesel engine, due to its significantly lower fuel consumption, you'd be crazy to buy anything but a diesel, unless there are issues with the newness of the engine. Mike Schumann "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Mike, I'm surprised there isn't more interest in the diesel version in the US. What percentage of DA40s sold in Europe are diesel vs. gas? It is not offered in the US. Simple as that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When you look at the increased range and payload possible with the DA40
with a diesel engine, due to its significantly lower fuel consumption, you'd be crazy to buy anything but a diesel, unless there are issues with the newness of the engine. Exactly, the problem. In addition , the American market has been less forgiving and experimental than the european market. I don't know why. But that seems to be the belief of the manufacturers. The margins are low, and the risks are high, and so less chances will be taken here than over there. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
because the manufacturers have the attitude that US consumers don't care about fuel efficiency. Is it the attitude of the manufacturers or that of the majority of the consumers? unless there are issues with the newness of the engine. There are issues - as with anything new. Nothing deal-breaking, though, AFAIK. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
like a lot of things about the airplane, it's just too bad it can't carry a little more a little farther. Then the DA42 might be your new plane. Stefan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan,
Then the DA42 might be your new plane. Same cabin, basically. So you might gain load, but not space. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Then the DA42 might be your new plane. Same cabin, basically. So you might gain load, but not space. Dan asked for more load and more range, the DA42 provides both. Plus more speed. Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 26th 04 09:41 PM |
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. | Roger | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 22nd 04 07:34 PM |
Cessna 182T w. G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 63 | July 22nd 04 07:06 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
P-38 Exhaust | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 10 | April 19th 04 07:03 AM |