![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dude wrote:
They are not that small at all. That's a big myth in many ways. Don't write them off as small without sitting in one to see how well it fits you. If you are long legged, it can be a good choice (Mooney's have LONG seat rails that can turn it into a 3 seater if the pilot is tall enough). My main beef with the Mooney (I've not got that many hours in them, and I've been in the older manual gear ones as well as a 1994 or thereabouts newer model) is that the forward visibility was terrible. The panel seems very high, and the windscreen very small. The older one felt almost 'tank slit' like. Although the physical width of the Mooney cabin is the same as a Bonanza, the Bonanza felt much bigger, probably because I could see out of it (I have long legs and a short body, maybe people with short legs and a long body don't have this problem). I'm not keen on Pipers for much the same reason (especially the Cherokee Six - the one I've been in may have just had an over inflated nose-strut, but that huge long nose combined with a slight nose up attitude on the ground meant that the view ahead was more like in a tailwheel plane than a nosedragger). The Lance has to be the worst though - with that huge long nose, not only is the forward visibility crap, but the plane looks ugly and misproportioned too. As with anything - the best thing to do is to try the plane on for size. I found the Mooney a great flying plane, but due to the rather poor outward visibility, if I had that kind of money I'd be buying a Bonanza instead. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dylan Smith wrote: My main beef with the Mooney (I've not got that many hours in them, and I've been in the older manual gear ones as well as a 1994 or thereabouts newer model) is that the forward visibility was terrible. The panel seems very high, and the windscreen very small. The older one felt almost 'tank slit' like. Did you have the seat pulled forward so you could press the rudder pedals to full deflection? I find pulling the seat forward gives you a great angle of vision because you're so close to the windscreen. OTOH, some people find it uncomfortable -because- they're so close to the windscreen. Claustrophobia, you know. if I had that kind of money I'd be buying a Bonanza instead. If I had Bonanza money, I'd fly a Bonanza, too. Mooney and Bonanza are not the same kind of money. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mooney drops into my backyard | Dave Butler | Owning | 41 | May 11th 04 10:19 PM |
Advice request -- buying an airplane | Casey Wilson | Owning | 4 | April 19th 04 03:22 PM |
Mooney info | eddie | Owning | 13 | March 12th 04 06:42 PM |
Mooney to Offer Light Sport Airplane | Rick Pellicciotti | Home Built | 4 | September 24th 03 01:08 PM |
Cirrus vs Mooney | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 6 | July 8th 03 11:35 PM |