![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim -
Yes, you can remove alcohol from a gasahol mixture, but in so doing you will have a remaining all-hydrocarbon fuel that has substantially less antiknock capability - lower octane. I don't know how much the octane reduction is but I suspect what you have left would be marginal even in a lawnmower. But to separate the mixture, simply mix the gasahol aggressively for several minutes with a substantial volume of water, then allow the mix to settle. This will allow the water to remove most of the alcohol from the mixture so that only the hydrocarbon component is left. The water at the bottom will now have the alcohol in solution. Yes, gasahol has eliminated gas line freezeup problems. But no way would I want to put it in an aircraft. You can test for alcohol in a fuel sample by mixing about 10 parts sample with 1 part of water, shaking the mixture for a minute, let it settle, and see if the apparent volume of the water has increased. If it has, you had alcohol in the original sample. I check each car-filling-station load of fuel I buy in Wisconsin, where gasahol is not mandated. The station dealer is aware of our aircraft use, but of course he is somewhat in the dark with the regulatory climate so we can't really depend on him. Otherwise I try to buy fuel from an FBO that supposedly has a certified load of Mogas. A few filling stations in Minnesota, where gasahol is otherwise mandated, and marinas will have a pump of straight gasoline for "old engines" etc on the side somewhere. Gasahol can work in a processor controlled car engine that has a closed loop system to control spark timing and mixture. An engine properly operating on gasahol will only produce about 95% of the power output of a hydrocarbon fueled engine. Non processor controlled car engines just run a little feebler, although the powers that be say they will emit less bad stuff. There is controversy on this. Airplane engines have no processor, and even if they did, giving up another 5% of the takeoff power would be out of the question for a certificated aircraft. Maybe with a reduction in allowable gross weight? But what about the reduction in octane? Still lower compression? Ugh! It doesn't make for a good solution. At any rate, aircraft fuel systems have not been made tolerant of alcohol laced fuels probably because there are so many other technical and legal obstacles to their successful use. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|