A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CHTs - What is acceptable?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 04, 07:55 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TripFarmer wrote:
I just don't buy that "airframe" stuff. A cylinder head can only take
so much temperature for so long before it gives in. 400 degrees is
400 degrees no matter what airframe it's in. If I'm wrong please tell
me why.........


I agree the temperature a cylinder can tolerate probably doesn't depend on the
airframe, but the method of measurement might. Where is the CHT probe on the
cylinder? Don't know, but maybe Piper puts the probe in one hole, and Cessna in
another.


  #2  
Old August 20th 04, 03:56 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dave Butler wrote:

I agree the temperature a cylinder can tolerate probably doesn't depend on the
airframe, but the method of measurement might. Where is the CHT probe on the
cylinder? Don't know, but maybe Piper puts the probe in one hole, and Cessna in
another.


In a sense, you're probably right. There's a threaded hole in the cylinder head. The
probe goes there, no matter what the airframe. The only way the airframe could make a
difference is if a) they have the probe in only one cylinder and b) the
temperatures on the other cylinders are known to be significantly different.

So, if Piper puts the probe in cylinder #1 for one aircraft and cylinder #4 in
another, the allowable max temperatures are likely to be different for the two.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.
  #3  
Old August 20th 04, 01:24 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ...

. The only way the airframe could make a
difference is if a) they have the probe in only one cylinder and b) the
temperatures on the other cylinders are known to be significantly different.

And both of the above are the case. Unless you have an engine analyzer
the CHT is only measuring one cylinder. They usually try to put it in the
hottest cylinder (one of the back ones), but that varies based on how the
engine cooling air is designed on the airframe.

The oil temperature temps have an even greater variation.

  #4  
Old August 20th 04, 02:41 PM
James M. Knox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a sense, you're probably right. There's a threaded hole in the
cylinder head. The probe goes there, no matter what the airframe. The
only way the airframe could make a difference is if a) they have the
probe in only one cylinder and b) the temperatures on the other
cylinders are known to be significantly different.


Actually, it can make a difference even beyond that. The fine folks at
GAMI (as part of their liquid air project) completely instrumented a few
cylinders (dozens of probes each) and went flying. They found 80
degree differences from one side of some cylinders to the other side.
So even a threaded CHT probe may or may not be telling you the true
temperature of even THAT cylinder.

FWIW, GAMI theorizes that this uneven cooling air around each cylinder
may be a significant cause of the cylinder operating "out of round" and
causing significant scuffing and wear.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! Bruce A. Frank Home Built 1 July 4th 04 07:28 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM
High CHTs on Cessna 175 Ron Natalie Owning 2 September 9th 03 02:14 AM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 20 August 27th 03 09:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.