![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Weir" wrote in message ... (COUGARNFW) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Nobody looks it up. The 4522 lamp is usually used in a swing-down lamp. The -swing down lamp has a motor to drive the lamp up or down. Yes, well, when you look it up, you might want to use the right number. The original poster said 4552, not 4522. If you had a clue about things, you would know that no 172 ever made had a swing-lamp setup. That died with the C-170 series. Google on 4552 and see your error. Well, Jim, I think you are being unfair to someone trying to be helpful, and to be candid this guy Cougar from Sacramento has been very generous with his expertise on the Stromberg carburetor and the files he has generated on it and shared with some of us. If it weren't for these wonderful files (some of which can be found at Ron Wanttaja's website), I wouldn't have been able to make the neat little tool necessary to check and set the quirky float level on a Stromberg. And yesterday after having spent a half day sweating and changing out washers under the seat and checking and rechecking the float level with gasoline in the bowl from a tube and a gallon of mogas overhead, I thanked him every minute. I was also grateful when the little C-85-powered taildragger's engine sprang to life, purred, and flew gallantly aloft after I had finished doing a bundle of wrenching and safety-wiring. And finally, thanks to Cougar because it would have cost us over two weeks time and over $500 if we had had to send that carburetor off for rebuild. And now we have a carb which runs neither too rich nor too lean and doesn't leak gas all over the ramp. So pick on someone who really deserves it, because he of all people, in his kindness and generosity, should not be the butt of your caustic remarks. You have been kind and generous with your technical advice. That is where YOU shine, not at being mean. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nobody looks it up. The 4522 lamp is usually used in a swing-down lamp.
The landing lamp is a GE 4522. If I posted different, then it is my error and I appologize. Hank |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If your lamp is a 4522 then it is a PAR46 bulb, 13 volts 250 watts
5.75 inch dia with a rated life of 25 hours. 250w/13v = 19.23 amps not counting the initial surge of about 5 times the rated current. A 20 amp breaker is too small to power this lamp. You can get lamps in this same size glass housing from 35 to 450 watts. A 4552 lamp is a 250 watt 28 volt PAR64 lamp , 8 inch dia which is the number you listed first This lamp will draw about 9 amps which is about correct for a 20 amp breaker. I suspect someone installed the wrong lamp in your aircraft. Many 14volt 172's use a par36, 4509 lamp which is rated at 13 volts, 100 watts, 7.7amps. You need to look up in the parts list for the aircraft the correct part number of the lamp. On 21 Aug 2004 23:36:14 GMT, (Hankal) wrote: Nobody looks it up. The 4522 lamp is usually used in a swing-down lamp. The landing lamp is a GE 4522. If I posted different, then it is my error and I appologize. Hank |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect someone installed the wrong lamp in your aircraft. Many
14volt 172's use a par36, 4509 lamp which is rated at 13 volts, 100 watts, 7.7amps. You need to look up in the parts list for the aircraft the correct part number of the lamp. I did look at the parts manual and it states GE 4522 and the breaker is a 20 amp. Would a 4509 or 4905 fit in the same housing? Hank |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 4522 lamp is a PAR46 bulb, 13 volts 250 watts 290,000 cp
5.75 inch dia with a rated life of 25 hours. 250w/13v = 19.23 amps If it runs at more than 13 volts it will draw more current and burn out quicker. A 20 amp breaker is running very close to its limit powering this lamp. Since these breakers are thermal breakers a poor crimp or a loose screw on the breaker terminals will cause extra heating and cause the breaker to trip at lower than 20 amps. As these breakers age they trip at lower than rated current due to oxide build up on the internal contacts. The next smaller wattage in the same lamp shell size, PAR 46, is a 4537. This is rated at 100 watts 13v, 200,000 cp My 172M uses two 4905 lamps at 100 watts each which are PAR 36. These are a smaller diameter lamp and will NOT fit in t PAR46 mount. Look for hot crimps on the breaker wires and chafed wires going to the lamp. On 22 Aug 2004 21:59:44 GMT, (Hankal) wrote: I suspect someone installed the wrong lamp in your aircraft. Many 14volt 172's use a par36, 4509 lamp which is rated at 13 volts, 100 watts, 7.7amps. You need to look up in the parts list for the aircraft the correct part number of the lamp. I did look at the parts manual and it states GE 4522 and the breaker is a 20 amp. Would a 4509 or 4905 fit in the same housing? Hank |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The next smaller wattage in the same lamp shell size, PAR 46, is a
4537. This is rated at 100 watts 13v, 200,000 cp I will put one of those in mine |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If he had simply stated that the bulb drew thus and such a current and was used
in a swing-down application, I would have simply stated that he was using the wrong bulb number supplied by the original poster (who, it turns out, screwed up and posted the wrong number to begin with). Instead, he starts of with a particularly snotty "Nobody looks it up" when half a dozen of us DID take the time to look up a rather obscure bulb and post our findings. He got a snotty answer back. End of story. Jim " jls" shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -"Jim Weir" wrote in message .. . - (COUGARNFW) - shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - - -Nobody looks it up. - Yes, well, when you look it up, you might want to use the right number. - - - -Well, Jim, I think you are being unfair to someone trying to be helpful Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
f he had simply stated that the bulb drew thus and such a current and was
used in a swing-down application, I would have simply stated that he was using the wrong bulb number Ok here are the facts. The plane is a 1973 Cessna 172 M. The landing light is a 4522. 250 watt at 14 volts. By ohms law is draws 17.86 amps. The Circuit Breaker Part number is S-1360-20---20 amp This is from the equipment table on page 20-35 Either the Cessna book is wrong or the light should be of lower wattage or the circuit breaker should be of a higher amperage. Hank |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds just about right to me. Have you checked your grounds and for
a chafed wire yet? Or is the barking of the newsgroup dogs starting to get to you? I have come to the conclusion to install a 100 watt |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
landing light | Hankal | Owning | 7 | July 16th 04 03:16 PM |
Would a 3 million Candlepower spotlight make a good landing light? | Legrande Harris | Home Built | 6 | June 15th 04 06:32 AM |
C-172 landing light switch | JFLEISC | Owning | 10 | May 5th 04 11:05 PM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |