A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How to rent out my airplane



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 04, 05:32 PM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It would require annual and 100hr inspections (i.e. every 100 hours
it flies), in addition to miscellaneous repairs.

Nope.

-----------------------------------------------------------
May 3, 1984
In Reply Refer To: ACE-7

Mr. Perry Rackers
Jefferson City Flying Service
PO Box 330
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101


Dear Mr. Rackers:

This is in reply to your request of May 1, 1984, that we render an
opinion regarding the applicability of the 100-hour inspections
requirement of Section 91.169(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations
to rental aircraft.

Section 91.169(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations provides that,
except as noted in Section 91.169(c), a person may not operate an
aircraft carrying any person, other than a crewmember, for hire, and
may not give flight instruction for hire in an aircraft which that
person provides unless, within the previous 100 hours of time in
service, the aircraft has received either an annual or a 100-hour
inspection.

If a person merely leases or rents an aircraft to another person and
does not provide the pilot, that aircraft is not required by Section
91.169(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations to have a 100-hour
inspection. As noted above, the 100-hour inspection is required only
when the aircraft is carrying a person for hire, or when a person is
providing flight instruction for hire, in their own aircraft.

If there are any questions, please advise us.

Sincerely,
/s/
Joseph T. Brennan
Associate Regional Counsel

February 14, 1975

Mr. Robert W. Slater


Dear Mr. Slater:

We refer to your letter dated January 28, 1975, which requests our
interpretation of FAR 91.169(b) as that regulation might apply to your
flying club.

You state that the Georgia Lockheed Employees Recreation Club, Inc.
(GLERC) is a nonprofit organization which owns five Cessna airplanes.
These airplanes are operated by members of GLERC Flying Club, Inc. It
is not clear whether Georgia Lockheed Employees Recreation Club, Inc.
is the same organization as GLERC Flying Club, Inc. If these two
corporations are in fact different, I assume that the Recreation Club
permits the Flying Club to utilize the airplanes by lease or other
similar arrangement.

You pose the following question:

If a student furnishes an airplane which is not operated for hire to
be used for his own flight instruction and he then pays a flight
instructor for instruction, must the airplane have received a 100 hour
inspection within the previous 100 hours in order to comply with FAR
91.169(b)?

For the purposes of our reply, we assume that the "student" referred
to above is a member of GLERC Flying Club, Inc. and the airplane
furnished is one of the Cessnas operated by the Flying Club.

Section 91.169(b) pertinently provides:
... [1] no person may operate an aircraft carrying any person
(other than a crewmember) for hire, and [2] no person may give flight
instruction for hire in an aircraft which that person provides unless
within the preceding 100 hours of time in service it has received ...
100-hour inspection ... (Numbers and brackets added.)

In the first instance, the student is not carrying anyone for hire.
Moreover, the flight instructor is a crewmember. Thus, there is no
requirement for the airplane to have a 100-hour inspection.

In the second instance, the flight instructor is not providing his own
airplane, the airplane being furnished by the student. Thus, this part
of Section 91.169(b) does not appear to be applicable.

In view of the above, it is our opinion that FAR 91.169(b) does not
apply to the factual situation presented.

Very truly yours,
R.R. HAGADONE
Attorney
Office of the Regional Counsel



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.