![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 06:53:15 GMT, "Julian Scarfe"
wrote: I don't know what else you fly, Ron, but aircraft like the TB20, the PA28s and most light twins seem to handle crosswind take-offs with rather more comfort. "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... Sorry about that. I did some reinstallation and my signature got changed. But I've got over 2,500 hours in a Mooney M20E. And I presently fly out of a single runway airport with occasionally strong, gusty crosswinds. I've not had a problem with crosswind takeoffs, either. Just hold the nose down, aileron into the wind, and pop-off when ready to fly. Obviously on a paved strip. Well, I was looking to see if the M20J and M20E had any differences that would explain our difference in perception, but I'm not sure there is any. The M20J was cleaned up by Lo Presti to the tune of about 20 knots, but isn't it the same wing set at the same height above the ground? I've described the issue I had in other posts, so I won't repeat it. While I don't have your time on the aircraft, I did accumulate more than 500 hours. And if you are talking about a 2,000' (610m) runway with trees to the end, then yes, I would not want to be based there, given a choice. But, at least here in the US, I don't believe I've ever seen a paved, short runway where the 50' obstacle was at the beginning of the runway. Grass is another story. I've been into Lubec airport (65B) which is 2024' (617m), grass, with trees right to the end. Landing was not much of a problem. But takeoff was close to the trees, even at 150 lbs under MGW. I had a co-owner/partner in the Mooney group who is much braver than I was with shorter strips. I'll check to see what he regards as "short". ;-) Julian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:50:08 GMT, "Julian Scarfe"
wrote: Well, I was looking to see if the M20J and M20E had any differences that would explain our difference in perception, but I'm not sure there is any. The M20J was cleaned up by Lo Presti to the tune of about 20 knots, but isn't it the same wing set at the same height above the ground? I've described the issue I had in other posts, so I won't repeat it. While I don't have your time on the aircraft, I did accumulate more than 500 hours. Well, although the 'J' has the same wing, it has a longer body and a higher MGW. But I don't know what that plus the clean up mods do for take off and landing distances -- I don't have a POH for the 'J'. I think the stall speed may be a few knots higher, so that could make a difference at the margins. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any opinions on the Garmin GNS 480 ! ! ! | RonLee | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 18th 05 12:33 PM |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |