![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
... Anyway, even with those caveats, I'm not saying you couldn't land a Mooney there. A person flying by the numbers, using proper technique, should be fine. It's just no place to be sloppy. I think that's the key. I implied in my original post that the M20J requires more landing distance than comparable tourers. On reflection in the light of others' posts, and perusal of some numbers, I think that's misleading. The issue is that it's much less forgiving of any imprecision in technique. Given that we're all human, I still think that's a good reason to think hard about whether you want to base a Mooney at a relatively short field. Julian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any opinions on the Garmin GNS 480 ! ! ! | RonLee | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 18th 05 12:33 PM |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |