![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that you can look at the market to see where the crossover
occurs. THere are currently no production piston aircraft engines over 450hp and there are no aircraft turbines under 400hp. There's lots of ground turbines under 400hp so we know there's a market there; [...] A ground turbine runs at almost constant speed, near its design point, so even at small dimension can still be fuel efficient. Part load fuel consumption of a gas turbine is a bit too high, particularly for GA aircraft (considering their flight pprofile). -- Fritz |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fritz" wrote in message
... A ground turbine runs at almost constant speed, near its design point, so even at small dimension can still be fuel efficient. Part load fuel consumption of a gas turbine is a bit too high, particularly for GA aircraft (considering their flight pprofile). Hmmm...define "fuel efficient"? Your comment brings to mind the Toyota Prius hybrid engine. It essentially has a "continuously variable transmission" that doesn't involve a complicated, maintenance-hungry belt or chain and pully system. I wonder if the answer to bringing turbine engines to small airplanes might not be using a hybrid system. The weight of the batteries (which is substantial) is offset by the relatively low weight of the rest of the power train. The engine would only run during climbs, and when the batteries need to be recharged. Biggest problem I see right off the bat is the problem of starting and stopping the turbine frequently...my understanding is that there are "issues" there, but I don't know what they are, or whether they can be addressed by design. Using such a system, a turbine could be run "at almost constant speed, near its design point", while accomodating a variety of power settings. All that said, someone else mentioned turbine-engined locomotives; that's a much bigger power demand and yet somehow diesel-electric engines wound up the standard. I suppose looking at the history of train locomotives might offer some insight into how feasible hybrid technology might be for airplanes. It might be that there are some unsolveable problems, or it might be that we're at a stage in engine development now where things that used to be problems aren't anymore. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|