![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter R. wrote: Roy Smith ) wrote: That was in the letter I wrote to complain. The (written) response was "you have to follow all instructions the controller gives you". To which you should have returned: "What regulation states that a VFR aircraft in class E (which I presume you were in) airspace is required to follow all instructions given by the controller? Well, I look at it this way. I may have been stupid enough to have gotten into a ****ing contest with the FAA in the first place, but at least I was smart enough to quit while I still had some dry clothes on. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... Shoulda had the supervisor tell you what section of the Federal Aviation Regulation supports his assertion that ATC control VFR aircraft outside of B or C airspace. He might respond with FAR 91.123(b), which states; "Except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which air traffic control is exercised." Well, the VFR aircraft is in Class E airspace, and Class E airspace is obviously an area in which air traffic control is exercised, so if the controller instructs the pilot to maintain a specific altitude then absent an emergency the pilot must maintain that specified altitude, right? Wrong. That line of reasoning would treat all ATC instructions equally. Let's take a rather extreme example to illustrate. Let's say you're on short final in Class D airspace when the tower instructs you to "roll inverted and pull". Must you adhere to that instruction? Are you required by regulation to bury yourself and your aircraft in the dirt? Of course not. Clearly, then, there are limits to the "control" exercised by ATC. FAA Order 7110.65 places substantial limits on the authority of ATC in various situations. Paragraph 2-1-1. ATC SERVICE states, in part: "Provide air traffic control service in accordance with the procedures and minima in this order except when: a. A deviation is necessary to conform with ICAO Documents, National Rules of the Air, or special agreements where the U.S. provides air traffic control service in airspace outside the U.S. and its possessions or: NOTE- Pilots are required to abide by CFRs or other applicable regulations regardless of the application of any procedure or minima in this order." In short, ATC cannot require you to do something which would be a violation of an FAR. That altitude assigned by our wayward controller could require to violate cloud clearance requirements or minimum safe altitudes. FAA Order 7110.65 does have provisions for the issuance of altitudes to VFR aircraft, but only in Class B and Class C airspace, the Outer Area associated with Class C airspace, and in TRSAs. That makes sense, because ATC separates VFR aircraft in those areas. Clearly, if separation is required the controller must have the necessary tools to provide it. But outside of those areas ATC does not separate VFR aircraft and has no authority to assign altitudes to them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You didn't mention, but I presume you were not flying in the class bravo at
the time? That is weird. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Progress on Flying Car | Steve Dufour | General Aviation | 5 | December 19th 03 03:48 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |