![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote: That's different. The original poster was suggesting that you request traffic advisories while under the class-B floor. In my experience, you won't get VFR traffic advisories from NY ATC. Not in my experience. Sure, if it's busy they may not be able, but most of the time advisories are no problem. I've never tried to get advisories from TRACON while under the class B. I've no idea what RADAR coverage they have there, in fact. If I'm going to be talking to someone anyway, why not get clearance through? Oh, well, this isn't quite true. Plenty of times I've contacted TRACON while under the class B after departing CDW, but I've always requested class B as well as advisories. On the rare case where I couldn't climb immediately, I've still usually received the flight following. There have been odd cases where I've not been able to get advisories outside of the class B, but they've been few and - at least as far as I can recall - all situations where the issue was workload. Usually, I'm told to call back in a few minutes. FWIW, I've also done the "Parkway Transition" at 1000, but this involves talking to Newark Tower. They had me wait once, but have never said "no". So my experience with NY TRACON has been that they're usually quite willing to provide VFR advisories. - Andrew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com... Roy Smith wrote: "G.R. Patterson III" wrote: That's different. The original poster was suggesting that you request traffic advisories while under the class-B floor. In my experience, you won't get VFR traffic advisories from NY ATC. Not in my experience. Sure, if it's busy they may not be able, but most of the time advisories are no problem. I've never tried to get advisories from TRACON while under the class B. I've no idea what RADAR coverage they have there, in fact. If I'm going to be talking to someone anyway, why not get clearance through? If you fly along the LI shore past JFK, you might not get cleared into Class B (which starts just above 500'), but you can usually get traffic advisories underneath. Along the Hudson corridor, though, I think they want you in Class B for advisories. --Gary |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
st JFK, you might not get cleared into Class B (which starts just above 500'), but you can usually get traffic advisories underneath. That's not really very convenient for me. Plus, I'd prefer to be higher. Plus plus, over Manhatten would certainly add to the fun. That's why I'm looking for a route through the class B. Hopefully, someone'll write that something like TEB-LGA at 5500 is what they prefer, or some such. That would work perfectly for me. Along the Hudson corridor, though, I think they want you in Class B for advisories. I'm afraid I don't understand. When someone writes "the Hudson corridor", he or she is usually referring to the "exclusion zone" in which people can fly within - but not in - the class B. I have flown *over* the corridor while speaking to ATC (LGA tower, mostly). Is that what you mean? I didn't know that this was preferred by ATC. [*I* like it because it permits a transit over Manhatten and then down the East River. A nice alternative view to just the Hudson.] - Andrew |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ne.com,
Andrew Gideon wrote: Gary Drescher wrote: st JFK, you might not get cleared into Class B (which starts just above 500'), but you can usually get traffic advisories underneath. That's not really very convenient for me. Plus, I'd prefer to be higher. Plus plus, over Manhatten would certainly add to the fun. That's why I'm looking for a route through the class B. Hopefully, someone'll write that something like TEB-LGA at 5500 is what they prefer, or some such. That would work perfectly for me. If you're transiting the Class B east-west, NY Approach will often hand you off to LGA Tower, and tower will bring you right over the top of the airport at 1500. They'll tell you to fly directly over the runway intersection. Heading west, LGA Tower will sometimes give you back to NY Approach, or sometimes just hand you off directly to TEB Tower as you cross the Hudson. It seems strange the first time, but it actually makes a lot of sense. Right over the top of the airport, all the traffic is at ground level, safely below you. You get some good sight-seeing in too! Along the Hudson corridor, though, I think they want you in Class B for advisories. I'm afraid I don't understand. When someone writes "the Hudson corridor", he or she is usually referring to the "exclusion zone" in which people can fly within - but not in - the class B. I have flown *over* the corridor while speaking to ATC (LGA tower, mostly). Is that what you mean? I didn't know that this was preferred by ATC. I think what he meant was while they're often willing to give you a Class B clearance at 1500 down (or up) the Hudson, if you call them up at 1000 in the exclusion corridor and ask for flight following, you'll almost certainly be turned down. My personal preference is 1500 with the clearance; the view is just as good, and I like the idea of not being down in the zoo of traffic at 1000. NY Approach will clear you in, then hand you off to LGA Tower, who in turn will hand you off to EWR Tower once you get to about midtown. If you're looking for a scenic route, I've often had good luck getting Class Bravo clearances up the East River. Once you get to the 59th Street Bridge, you'll get your choice of a left turn over Central Park and over to the Hudson, or a right turn over LGA (see above) and out to Long Island Sound. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
If you're transiting the Class B east-west, NY Approach will often hand you off to LGA Tower, and tower will bring you right over the top of the airport at 1500. They'll tell you to fly directly over the runway intersection. Heading west, LGA Tower will sometimes give you back to NY Approach, or sometimes just hand you off directly to TEB Tower as you cross the Hudson. It seems strange the first time, but it actually makes a lot of sense. Right over the top of the airport, all the traffic is at ground level, safely below you. You get some good sight-seeing in too! I understand that. My usual route from CDW to points south passes over EWR. I'm a little surprised at the altitude, though. I've not looked at the approach plates, but I'd have guessed that JFK's approaches from the north would be an issue. - Andrew |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com... Along the Hudson corridor, though, I think they want you in Class B for advisories. I'm afraid I don't understand. When someone writes "the Hudson corridor", he or she is usually referring to the "exclusion zone" in which people can fly within - but not in - the class B. I have flown *over* the corridor while speaking to ATC (LGA tower, mostly). Is that what you mean? Yup, sorry I stated it confusingly. The times I've approached the Hudson with flight following, intending to fly in the Class E corridor, ATC cleared me up into the Class B. When I replied that I'd rather stay below (for a better view), they terminated services. I assume that's either because the exclusion zone is too low for radar coverage, or else because it has too much traffic for them to issue advisories there. --Gary |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
I assume that's either because the exclusion zone is too low for radar coverage, or else because it has too much traffic for them to issue advisories there. I'm not sure about the coverage, but can definitely see the problem issuing advisories for that (as Roy calls it {8^) zoo. I've never tried this myself, as - if I'm going to be in the zoo - I'd rather be on the same frequency as all the other animals laugh. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Progress on Flying Car | Steve Dufour | General Aviation | 5 | December 19th 03 03:48 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |