A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

no RPM drop on mag check



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th 04, 12:47 PM
WARREN1157
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No mag drop on runup is UNACCEPTABLE. You need to know both

You can wait until it gets dark. Pull the airplane by a mercury vapor street
light. Try to set the RPM at 1800. If the prop appears to stop at 1800 RPM your
tach is right on the money.

Run the engine until the prop appears to stop like if a timing light was
shining on it.Do your mag check. The prop should appear to turn to the left
because the RPM dropped. If it does this you should be able to tell if the mags
are independent of each other.

This takes some precision throttle movements to get the initial 1800 RPM
setting, but in the end the whole process is self explanatory.

This is also a tach check. The prop should show some motion change at 600 -
1200 - 1800 - 2400 RPM. Three blade props might or might not work like this,
logic says they will but at a different RPM.

Hope this helps.

Just My 2¢ Worth
  #2  
Old October 28th 04, 03:23 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WARREN1157 wrote:
No mag drop on runup is UNACCEPTABLE. You need to know both



You can wait until it gets dark. Pull the airplane by a mercury vapor street
light. Try to set the RPM at 1800. If the prop appears to stop at 1800 RPM your
tach is right on the money.

Run the engine until the prop appears to stop like if a timing light was
shining on it.Do your mag check. The prop should appear to turn to the left
because the RPM dropped. If it does this you should be able to tell if the mags
are independent of each other.

This takes some precision throttle movements to get the initial 1800 RPM
setting, but in the end the whole process is self explanatory.

This is also a tach check. The prop should show some motion change at 600 -
1200 - 1800 - 2400 RPM. Three blade props might or might not work like this,
logic says they will but at a different RPM.


Thanks, Warren and everyone! To summarize: There could be a problem with the
switch or the p-leads, but since the mags were just timed, it seems likely the
timing is off. Thanks for the mercury vapor light tach check suggestion, Warren.
That should be a more sensitive test than looking for small movement on the
analog tach. The consensus seems to be this is a symptom that should not be ignored.

(assuming the timing is wrong): the danger is (1) reduced power output? (2)
detonation? (3) inability to test magnetos at runup. Is that the kernel of it?

Thanks again to everyone. Dave

  #3  
Old October 28th 04, 06:02 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dave Butler wrote:

(assuming the timing is wrong): the danger is (1) reduced power output? (2)
detonation? (3) inability to test magnetos at runup. Is that the kernel of it?


Reduced power, increased EGT, and increased risk of burning exhaust valves. Inability
to test mags comes way last. Risk of detonation is actually decreased (probably
eliminated).

By the way -- if my IA gave me the reply that he "would expect very minimal RPM drop"
after timing them, I would take it elsewhere to get the timing checked.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #4  
Old October 29th 04, 12:48 AM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ...

By the way -- if my IA gave me the reply that he "would expect very minimal RPM drop"
after timing them, I would take it elsewhere to get the timing checked.


Excellent point. Most of the smaller ContiLycoSaurus engines
should show a minimum 50-75 rpm drop. This should be noticable just
by the sound. If the mag drop is not perceptable, that's a bad thing
and the IA should know that.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #5  
Old November 1st 04, 01:30 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bigger bore cylinders (like an IO-360) should show even more mag drop
than small cylinders (like an O-300). It takes slightly more time for
the flame front to get across the cylinder head. Something is wrong
here.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RPM drop and "popping" sound on mag check, C-172 C Kingsbury Owning 7 September 14th 04 11:06 AM
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 71 June 10th 04 08:02 PM
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride Barry Instrument Flight Rules 1 August 9th 03 09:25 PM
check your tachometer Robert Scott Owning 1 August 4th 03 06:28 PM
check your tachometer Robert Scott Home Built 0 August 4th 03 05:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.