A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA credit card --- WARNING.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 04, 02:24 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll" said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...

1. Saddam has weapons of mass destruction - LIE


Not a lie. It may have been wrong but it was definitely not a lie. The one
point before the war on which there was agreement was that Saddam had WMD.


Most of the intelligence source said he didn't. Bush's people decided to
believe the ONE source (who was a defector and then very suspect) who told
them what they wanted to beleive.


2. Saddam has ties to Al Queda - LIE


Not a lie, Saddams ties to Al Qaeda were demonstrated.


Thoroughly disproved by the 9/11 Commission.

3. Saddam is a threat to America - LIE


How so? Saddam with WMD is certainly a threat to America and it was agreed
that he had WMD.


He didn't have them, and if Bush's people hadn't cooked the books, we all
would have known that.

4. Saddam was attempting to buy Uranium from Niger - LIE


Not a lie, Saddam did attempt that.


Thoroughly disproved. The document cited in his State of the Union
address was known to be a lie before he cited it. It was even supposedly
signed by somebody who was no longer in the government position that he
supposedly was in.


5. Deposing Saddam will make America safer - LIE


Not a lie, the whole world is safer without Saddam.


Bull****. The US presence in Iraq is making thousands of new fanatical
terrorists every week, both in Iraq and outside. People whose anger was
directed towards their oppressor Saddam is now directed towards their
invaders, us. And Bush's calling it a "crusade" was sure to fanaticize a
lot of formerly moderate muslims.

6. The Iraqi people will greet American troops as liberators and there
will be no need for massive numbers of troops to secure the country
afterwards - WRONG


Many Iraqis did greet American troops as liberators.


Army war planners demanded 200,000 - 300,000 troops to make sure there
wasn't any looting and destruction of infastructure after the "end of
major combat operations". Rumsfeld overruled them and went in without
enough people, and the resulting chaos fueled the insurgency.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
"using Outlook to read e-mail is like licking public toilets; using Outlook
with a virus checker is like taking antibiotics and then licking public
toilets (it might work, but it's hardly optimal" -- David Megginson
  #2  
Old November 27th 04, 02:37 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, "Steven P. McNicoll"
said:
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...

1. Saddam has weapons of mass destruction - LIE


Not a lie. It may have been wrong but it was definitely not a lie. The
one
point before the war on which there was agreement was that Saddam had WMD.


Most of the intelligence source said he didn't. Bush's people decided to
believe the ONE source (who was a defector and then very suspect) who told
them what they wanted to beleive.


Wrong. Every nation with an intelligence gathering capability said he had
WMD. The only nation that disputed it was Iraq.



2. Saddam has ties to Al Queda - LIE


Not a lie, Saddams ties to Al Qaeda were demonstrated.


Thoroughly disproved by the 9/11 Commission.


Confirmed by inspectors in Iraq.



3. Saddam is a threat to America - LIE


How so? Saddam with WMD is certainly a threat to America and it was
agreed
that he had WMD.


He didn't have them, and if Bush's people hadn't cooked the books, we all
would have known that.


He was believed to have had them and it has not been proven that he didn't
have them. There's no evidence that any books were cooked and no reason to
believe any were.




4. Saddam was attempting to buy Uranium from Niger - LIE


Not a lie, Saddam did attempt that.


Thoroughly disproved.


No, it was proven.



The document cited in his State of the Union
address was known to be a lie before he cited it. It was even supposedly
signed by somebody who was no longer in the government position that he
supposedly was in.


5. Deposing Saddam will make America safer - LIE


Not a lie, the whole world is safer without Saddam.


Bull****. The US presence in Iraq is making thousands of new fanatical
terrorists every week, both in Iraq and outside. People whose anger was
directed towards their oppressor Saddam is now directed towards their
invaders, us. And Bush's calling it a "crusade" was sure to fanaticize a
lot of formerly moderate muslims.


Nonsense. You're entitled to your own opinions but you're not entitled to
your own facts. The fact is you've bought the propaganda.


  #3  
Old November 27th 04, 01:40 PM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You're the one buying the propoganda, Stevie boy. Hook, line and sinker.

That's understandable since there seem to be very few working brain cells
left in you cranium.

You're not still pushing tin, are you?

mike regish

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news:qLRpd.603

Nonsense. You're entitled to your own opinions but you're not entitled to
your own facts. The fact is you've bought the propaganda.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
For Keith Willshaw... robert arndt Military Aviation 253 July 6th 04 05:18 AM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning Julian Scarfe Owning 7 March 1st 04 08:11 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.