![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:Nlspd.150701$R05.147436@attbi_s53... Kinda timely since PBS's Frontline had a show on credit cards last Tuesday. Very eye opening, it seems that a couple of Supreme Court decisions allow credit card companies to charge whatever interest rate they want and to raise the interest rate on money already on the balance. Most of the credit card holders interviewed had never read or didn't understand the "fine print" in their card contracts. One lesser known fact about credit card companies is that they will screw the VENDOR far more readily than they will their customers. Over the past couple of years we have had a handful of guests with guaranteed reservations not show up at the inn, who were charged for one night's stay. Two of them simply called their credit card companies and disputed the charge -- at which point the credit card company immediately credited them and charged us back, no questions asked! It was then up to US to "prove" to VISA that the guest had stayed with us -- which, of course, they had not. Despite the fact that these guests insisted on "guaranteed reservations", despite the fact that we had pre-authorized their stay on their credit card, despite the fact that we had mailed post cards to their home, reminding them of their reservation -- and despite the fact that we followed VISA's own procedures for no-shows to the letter -- we were totally helpless, and had to eat the bill. No amount of documentation or phone calls mattered to VISA. THAT is the real credit card scandal that is sweeping America right now -- but no one outside of the industry knows (or, quite frankly) cares about it. But we ALL pay for scumbags like these in the end. That is unfortunate, but did you really "lose" money? The card companies make the money from the card holders, not the vendors. If no service was received then you can't charge. Now this then gets into a discussion of a "confirmed reservation" rather than a "regular reservation." I would not go so far as to say it is a scandal or that they are scumbags. Surely they are inconsiderate, but I think you overstate the case. Did you have to clean the room when they didn't show up? Did you turn away other guests? What you discuss is all part of the service industry. When you are in that business you (hopefully) understand that you have to deal with people and you cannot always choose your clients, though I suppose that would be nice. Until that day comes, i am afraid you will have to deal with all types of people and with the standard business practices. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick" wrote in message ... That is unfortunate, but did you really "lose" money? The card companies make the money from the card holders, not the vendors. You couldn't be more wrong. Credit card companies charge the 'vendors' a fee for each and every transaction. I fought with VISA for four months over a disputed charge where they gave credit to the card user and refused to refund the transaction fee they charged me. The so-called customer used a credit card to sign up two people for a conference. I paid the conference center based on a head count that included him and his wife. I showed VISA the signed contract that put a date limit on refunds. The customer did not provide any proof that they had ever cancelled, much less on or before the cancellation date. VISA refused to honor the charge and left me holding the bag. We no longer accept credit cards for conference registration. I put most of the blame on the scumbag deadhead. Have you never noticed signs near cash registers that deny the use of a credit card for sales below a minimum purchase? Have you never noticed some 'vendors' will offer a discount to customers that pay cash? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Casey Wilson" wrote in message news:z%bqd.2405$wr6.140@trnddc04... "Dick" wrote in message ... That is unfortunate, but did you really "lose" money? The card companies make the money from the card holders, not the vendors. You couldn't be more wrong. Credit card companies charge the 'vendors' a fee for each and every transaction. No, you couldn't be more wrong. Vendors choose the prices, consumers hold the cards. Consumers make the purchases. The fees are passed to the consumers. Again, I asked if he actually "lost money" in services or other goods. I fought with VISA for four months over a disputed charge where they gave credit to the card user and refused to refund the transaction fee they charged me. The so-called customer used a credit card to sign up two people for a conference. I paid the conference center based on a head count that included him and his wife. I showed VISA the signed contract that put a date limit on refunds. The customer did not provide any proof that they had ever cancelled, much less on or before the cancellation date. VISA refused to honor the charge and left me holding the bag. We no longer accept credit cards for conference registration. I put most of the blame on the scumbag deadhead. Have you never noticed signs near cash registers that deny the use of a credit card for sales below a minimum purchase? Have you never noticed some 'vendors' will offer a discount to customers that pay cash? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is unfortunate, but did you really "lose" money? The card
companies make the money from the card holders, not the vendors. You couldn't be more wrong. Credit card companies charge the 'vendors' a fee for each and every transaction. No, you couldn't be more wrong. Vendors choose the prices, consumers hold the cards. Consumers make the purchases. The fees are passed to the consumers. Actually, the credit card companies dip from both wells, charging consumers AND vendors. However, vendors are ALWAYS charged, while consumers are charged only if they're dumb enough to rack up balances, and pay 22% interest. Of course, in the end, consumers pay more because of the vendor charges, too -- but it's not always a 100% pass-through. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:52:34 -0500, "Dick" wrote:
No, you couldn't be more wrong. Vendors choose the prices, consumers hold the cards. Consumers make the purchases. The fees are passed to the consumers. In that sense, every cost is passed to the consumer. But in the case of credit cards, only the guy using the card gets the payback. After all, if every cost were simply passed to the consumer, why are United and U.S.Airlines in bankruptcy court? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com the blog www.danford.net |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote In that sense, every cost is passed to the consumer. But in the case of credit cards, only the guy using the card gets the payback. After all, if every cost were simply passed to the consumer, why are United and U.S.Airlines in bankruptcy court? all the best -- Dan Ford Bingo. They are not passing all the costs along, ant that means they are not charging as much as the service costs. Hard to imagine why they are losing money. -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:36:09 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote: "Cub Driver" wrote In that sense, every cost is passed to the consumer. But in the case of credit cards, only the guy using the card gets the payback. After all, if every cost were simply passed to the consumer, why are United and U.S.Airlines in bankruptcy court? all the best -- Dan Ford Bingo. They are not passing all the costs along, ant that means they are not charging as much as the service costs. Hard to imagine why they are losing money. In competitive businesses, such as airlines, you can't pass along costs that are related to inefficiencies in the way you do your business. And you can't pass along costs if those costs are higher than those of a competitor. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning | Julian Scarfe | Owning | 7 | March 1st 04 08:11 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |