A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I want to buy a plane by year-end but they're not making it easy.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old December 4th 04, 05:24 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tony,

The 4000 hours had to have lost them sales


Well, they're the best selling piston single engine aircraft line. So
just what do you base that statement on?
b
--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #3  
Old December 5th 04, 02:09 AM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thomas Borchert wrote:

Tony,

The 4000 hours had to have lost them sales


Well, they're the best selling piston single engine aircraft line. So
just what do you base that statement on?


That I don't have one yet?

- Andrew

  #4  
Old December 5th 04, 07:58 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew,

Well, they're the best selling piston single engine aircraft line. So
just what do you base that statement on?


That I don't have one yet?


You done broke the code, Lt.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #5  
Old December 5th 04, 06:47 AM
tony roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:

Tony,

The 4000 hours had to have lost them sales


Well, they're the best selling piston single engine aircraft line. So
just what do you base that statement on?
b


A couple of things actually.

First, the pure logic which dictates that many pilots would not lay out
$500,000 on an aircraft with a specified airframe life of 4000 hours.

Second, of the three friends of mine who own SR20's, they were all put
off by the specified airframe life of the SR22.

Third, a conversation with the Cirrus sales team at Arlington.
I asked them if they had any further progress in extending the airframe
life of the SR22. They told me that they were still waiting, but when it
was approved they expected sales on the SR22 to improve dramatically.

Tony

--

Tony Roberts
PP-ASEL
VFR OTT
Night
Cessna 172H C-GICE
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 October 1st 04 07:27 AM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 November 1st 03 06:27 AM
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) Grantland Military Aviation 1 October 2nd 03 12:17 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 October 1st 03 07:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.