A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Advice and experts with 400 series Cessnas (414 and 421), purchase and training



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 31st 04, 03:09 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

engine loss on most twins.. in the Reno/Tahoe area will NOT keep you out of
trouble..

The single engine service altitude on some twins is well below that mountain
pass.

BT

wrote in message
news:1104457427.9d9ebb6bf233270beb75b79a476ce16b@t eranews...
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:52:21 GMT, kontiki
wrote:

snip
2. I like to fly to Tahoe, Truckee and Reno. I'd like the piece of
mind that an engine loss won't leave me over terrain that is
impossible to land on safely.

snip


  #2  
Old December 31st 04, 03:31 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BTIZ wrote:

engine loss on most twins.. in the Reno/Tahoe area will NOT keep you out of
trouble..

The single engine service altitude on some twins is well below that mountain
pass.


True, but a twin that loses an engine above the single engine service
doesn't plummet instantly to that altitude. Depending on how long the
pass is, a twin that is flying well above the SESC could transit the
pass long before the slow descent has dropped it to the SESC.


Matt

  #3  
Old December 31st 04, 05:53 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:31:09 -0500, Matt Whiting
wrote:

BTIZ wrote:

engine loss on most twins.. in the Reno/Tahoe area will NOT keep you out of
trouble..

The single engine service altitude on some twins is well below that mountain
pass.


True, but a twin that loses an engine above the single engine service
doesn't plummet instantly to that altitude. Depending on how long the
pass is, a twin that is flying well above the SESC could transit the
pass long before the slow descent has dropped it to the SESC.


You don't need to be able to cruise all the way out of the mountains.
You just need to stay aloft long enough not to crash into a mountain
or canyon.
  #4  
Old December 31st 04, 06:51 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:09:04 -0800, "BTIZ"
wrote:

engine loss on most twins.. in the Reno/Tahoe area will NOT keep you out of
trouble..


On departure, maybe not. I'm thinking more at cruise or if you've
already got some altitude. Engine failures on departure are dangerous
no matter what you are flying. There is no way to eliminate all risk,
I just hope to minimize risk as much as possible.


The single engine service altitude on some twins is well below that mountain
pass.


This is something I will have to investigate with any aircraft I will
consider buying.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.