![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The runway disappears, but that has never bothered me as it always
reappears right where it was originally. When the runway disappears is a good time to look the other direction for the King Air zipping toward the same piece of asphalt. --------------------- She just couldn't believe that people flew a plane where the runway environment was invisible while turning base-to-final. -------------------- I can see where short people have a forward visibility problem, although cranking the seat up helps some. For us tall people, the headroom is great. I can barely sit in a Commanchee with headsets on, and the Cherokee was pretty limited too. The 182 does handle like a truck, but that's kind-of-nice sometimes, too. The differences are all secondary, though. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bk wrote:
The runway disappears, but that has never bothered me as it always reappears right where it was originally. When the runway disappears is a good time to look the other direction for the King Air zipping toward the same piece of asphalt. --------------------- She just couldn't believe that people flew a plane where the runway environment was invisible while turning base-to-final. -------------------- I can see where short people have a forward visibility problem, although cranking the seat up helps some. For us tall people, the headroom is great. I can barely sit in a Commanchee with headsets on, and the Cherokee was pretty limited too. The 182 does handle like a truck, but that's kind-of-nice sometimes, too. I hear that a lot, but I find the 67 Arrow I fly now to be just as trucky as the 182. It is a little lighter in pitch, but the rudders are stiffer. Roll is comparable. I also prefer the vernier controls to the quadrant controls in the Piper. Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also prefer the vernier controls to the quadrant controls in the Piper.
Isn't that odd? I find vernier controls annoying in the extreme. "To each, his own..." ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:JpEHd.15267$IV5.11720@attbi_s54... I also prefer the vernier controls to the quadrant controls in the Piper. Isn't that odd? I find vernier controls annoying in the extreme. "To each, his own..." ;-) I guess I never got used to them, but they remind me of using my lawn mower. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I also prefer the vernier controls to the quadrant controls in the Piper. Isn't that odd? I find vernier controls annoying in the extreme. "To each, his own..." I agree. Well, for VFR flying, I don't see much difference, but for instrument approaches, I really like being able to dial in just a little throttle. The Arrow is hard to adjust in less than about 1" of MP increments. I could adjust my 182 much more precisely. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High wing vs low wing | temp | Owning | 11 | June 10th 04 02:36 AM |
High Wing or Low Wing | Bob Babcock | Home Built | 17 | January 23rd 04 01:34 AM |
End of High wing low wing search for me | dan | Home Built | 7 | January 11th 04 10:57 AM |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |