![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You know what I realized? They are ALL good.
True Dave...I'd be happy with a nice C-172, Cherokee, whatever. So long as I can afford it and it's in decent condition, I'll take it. While we all felt that way at first, Jack, I think some of us are trying to save you from the learning curve that goes with buying that first plane. My experience seems to be all too typical. We truly thought we'd be happy with our Warrior forever. I lavished money on it, fixed it up to the "nth" degree, and -- just four years later -- had to sell it, because my kids were getting too big. Well, "had to" is a bit strong -- we could have made do with it. But 300 fpm climb on a hot summer day, and having to stop for fuel on our way to OSH proved that we had reached the practical limits of a 150 horsepower engine with four people aboard. I would have been SO much better off financially, in the long run, to have bought a Pathfinder/Dakota/Skylane back in '98, rather than taking the interim step with buying the Warrior. But who knew? I'd never heard of Usenet, and had no idea that there were so many valuable aircraft ownership resources available online. Now, you do. And the Arrow should keep you happy for a long while! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
While we all felt that way at first, Jack, I think some of us are trying to save you from the learning curve that goes with buying that first plane. And I definitely appreciate it. -- had to sell it, because my kids were getting too big. Hey, I won't have that excuse...done having kids, they're already too big :-) Now, you do. And the Arrow should keep you happy for a long while! Given my longer term aviation goals, I know I'll be happier/more satisfied with the Arrow vs. a C-172/Cherokee class plane. If, however, it proved that I couldn't swing something like the Arrow due to acquisition cost, higher insurance, etc. and had to settle for something more basic, I'd be ok with it. I'm just happy that things are working out with the partnership and airplane in the works. Of course, the big question for this year just may become where to park at Oshkosh...North-40 or Vintage? :-) -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL, IA Student, Piper Arrow purchasing student "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course, the big question for this year just may become where to park at
Oshkosh...North-40 or Vintage? :-) Now I may get lambasted for this, but I still don't feel that it's "right" to park a Piper Arrow in the Vintage section -- even if, technically, it's old enough. Call me a purist, but there's just something wrong with parking a plane that looks exactly like a current-production aircraft (because, well, it IS identical) next to a classic old Navion or Comanche. In a few years I suppose my Pathfinder will be eligible for "Classic" parking -- but you'll still find me happily watching departures from my lawn chair out in the North 40... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Now I may get lambasted for this What? You getting flamed? :-) Call me a purist, but there's just something wrong with parking a plane that looks exactly like a current-production aircraft (because, well, it IS identical) next to a classic old Navion or Comanche. Hmmm, interesting point Jay. Might there be some nasty backlash form the "pure" vintage crowd? Good question to ponder over the next six months :-) Hey, at least it's not an Arrow IV with, IMHO, the extremely goofy looking T-tail. Actually, that would be an interesting topic to hear from folks on both sides of the fence. Perhaps a future post. In a few years I suppose my Pathfinder will be eligible for "Classic" parking -- but you'll still find me happily watching departures from my lawn chair out in the North 40... That's one aspect of the North-40 that, IMHO, is *very* compelling. While being more centrally located in a place like Vintage sounds good, there's just something about kicking back in the morning/evening watching departures and arrivals that makes camping with everyone in the North-40 a ton of fun. -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL, IA Student, Student Arrow Buyer "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High wing vs low wing | temp | Owning | 11 | June 10th 04 02:36 AM |
High Wing or Low Wing | Bob Babcock | Home Built | 17 | January 23rd 04 01:34 AM |
End of High wing low wing search for me | dan | Home Built | 7 | January 11th 04 10:57 AM |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |