A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Auto conversions & gear boxes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 04, 11:10 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Morgans

I remember reading something about the mass balancer as you call it
but can't remember what it was the solution for. It could have been to
prevent the elevator from causing trouble when in the shock wave at
high mach?

Here is what I found on Internet. They say the strip was on the bottom
of the wing but I thougth I remembered it to be on the top. In any
event it stopped the dive problem.

Quote

Earlier Lightnings had problems with high-speed dives. When the
airspeed reached a sufficiently high value, the controls would
suddenly lock up and the Lightning would tuck its nose down, making
recovery from the dive difficult. In the worst case, the wings of the
Lightning could be ripped off if the speed got too high. This problem
caused the Lightning often to be unable to follow its Luftwaffe
opponents in a dive, causing many of the enemy to be able to escape
unscathed. The problem was eventually traced to the formation of a
shock wave over the wing as the Lightning reached transonic speeds,
this shock wave causing the elevator to lose much of its
effectiveness. The problem was not cured until the advent of the
P-38J-25-LO, which introduced a set of compressibility flaps under the
wing which changed the pattern of the shock wave over the wing when
they were extended, restoring the function of the elevator.

Unquote

Big John

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:03:44 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote:


"Big John" wrote in message

The P-38 had high speed dive problems. After a number crashed they
went back and retrofitted them with 'dive' brakes (narrow strips on
top of wing that could be raised to increase drag). These slowed the
bird down enough it could be pulled out

Wasn't part of that fix also a mass balancer on the elevator, that was a
blob raised up on an arm above the elevator?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto Alternator on an O-320-E2D Ebby Home Built 8 November 26th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 1 November 24th 03 02:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 2 November 24th 03 05:23 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 0 November 24th 03 03:52 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart D. Hull Home Built 0 November 22nd 03 06:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.