A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Challenger Crashe at TEB



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 6th 05, 03:05 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jon Kraus wrote:

It looks like the Challenger skidded off the runway and crashed into a
warehouse at TEB.


Yesterday, NPR news stated that the mayor is pushing for reducing the number of
flights at TEB and installing "foam crash barriers" at the ends of the runway.

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.

George Patterson
He who would distinguish what is true from what is false must have an
adequate understanding of truth and falsehood.
  #2  
Old February 6th 05, 03:56 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
...


Jon Kraus wrote:

It looks like the Challenger skidded off the runway and crashed into a
warehouse at TEB.


Yesterday, NPR news stated that the mayor is pushing for reducing the
number of
flights at TEB and installing "foam crash barriers" at the ends of the
runway.

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like
that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.


I suspect his point is not to protect the pax and crew as much as to protect
the people in the buildings and roads around the airport. That building the
Challenger crashed into happened to be empty, but during working hours that
one alone has more than 200 people in it.

Doesn't take away from the lack of imagination in thinking that foam will
solve any perceived problems with the airport, but might explain where he is
coming from.



  #3  
Old February 6th 05, 04:26 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

George Patterson wrote:

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.


Maybe, maybe not, I don't know. But if that plane would have hit a
school bus full of kids when crossing the road and/or that warehouse
would not have happened to be empty at that time, I bet the airport
would already be closed right now.

Stefdan
  #4  
Old February 6th 05, 05:02 PM
Colin W Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I wouldn't shoot so fast- TEB is a pretty major artery in the NYC area. It
handles probably more than half of the bizjet traffic into Manhattan and in
case it isn't obvious, the people who fly in those jets are, shall we say,
influential? This is not some little country strip supporting weekend Cub
flights. Besides, if they close TEB the traffic will just have to move to
somewhere else, and the NY/NJ Port Authority has enough trouble dealing with
the traffic at EWK, LGA, and JFK as it is.

"Stefan" wrote in message
...
George Patterson wrote:

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like

that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in

place.

Maybe, maybe not, I don't know. But if that plane would have hit a
school bus full of kids when crossing the road and/or that warehouse
would not have happened to be empty at that time, I bet the airport
would already be closed right now.

Stefdan



  #5  
Old February 6th 05, 05:26 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stefan" wrote in message ...
George Patterson wrote:

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.


Maybe, maybe not, I don't know. But if that plane would have hit a school bus full of kids when crossing the road
and/or that warehouse would not have happened to be empty at that time, I bet the airport would already be closed
right now.

Stefdan


I don't think so...


  #6  
Old February 6th 05, 05:05 PM
Colin W Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
...

Yesterday, NPR news stated that the mayor is pushing for reducing the

number of
flights at TEB and installing "foam crash barriers" at the ends of the

runway.

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like

that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.


Why not just pile up a bunch of barrels of gasoline? It'd cost a lot less,
stop the plane just as quick, and would be totally self-cleaning.

-cwk.


  #7  
Old February 6th 05, 05:27 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message ...


Jon Kraus wrote:

It looks like the Challenger skidded off the runway and crashed into a
warehouse at TEB.


Yesterday, NPR news stated that the mayor is pushing for reducing the number of
flights at TEB and installing "foam crash barriers" at the ends of the runway.

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.

George Patterson
He who would distinguish what is true from what is false must have an
adequate understanding of truth and falsehood.




Build some sort of ramp thing that would carry the plane up and over the road as it stops, like a runaway truck ramp
;-)


  #8  
Old February 6th 05, 06:42 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

George Patterson wrote:

Jon Kraus wrote:

It looks like the Challenger skidded off the runway and crashed into a
warehouse at TEB.



Yesterday, NPR news stated that the mayor is pushing for reducing the number of
flights at TEB and installing "foam crash barriers" at the ends of the runway.

No mention of the fact that the deceleration produced by barriers like that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.


Yes, but more voters drive cars on the hiqhway going past TEB than fly
out of it. That is all that matters to politicians.


Matt
  #9  
Old February 9th 05, 04:25 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"George Patterson" wrote in message No mention of the fact that the
deceleration produced by barriers like that
would have killed everyone on board this aircraft had they been in place.


That's barriers, not barricades. Foam barriers are being installed at most
large airports at the ends of the runways. They are made from special cement
which crunches when landing gears run through it thus decelerating the
aircraft with minimum damage. It is an excellent idea for airports such as
TEB.

D.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Challenger forum Dico Reyers Home Built 0 December 30th 03 06:48 PM
Ignoring the Challenger? robert arndt Military Aviation 0 July 1st 03 10:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.