Newsgroups and Email

It's not the bozos trying to peddle little blue pills or rod creams I'm talking
about. I've got a perfectly good spam filter program for that crap.

It is the person who sees something in the newsgroups, and because theirs is
painted blue instead of red emails me to ask if blue will work. I don't mind
sharing my opinion, but what about the other two dozen folks in this ng that
have a blue one as well? Don't they deserve to share in that discussion?

And, the day I can't post my name to that which I write is the day I stop
writing. I've a bit of John Hancock in me, I believe.

Jim



- So I would recommend at least entering a bogus dead-end email address in
-your newsreader setup. You don't even have to use your real name either.
-It's not dishonest, it's a matter of internet survival.

-

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

Jim-

Better be careful using that "S" word. Hormel is now vigorously
defending its trademark in the email world.

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/29981?mode=flat

--
Kevin McCue
KRYN
'47 Luscombe 8E
Rans S-17 (for sale)




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

"Kevin McCue" wrote in message ...
Jim-

Better be careful using that "S" word. Hormel is now vigorously
defending its trademark in the email world.

Hormel has no problem (at least they claim they don't) with people using
SPAM as a term to describe email. What they are protecting is anybody
attempting to use the SPAM trademark to any other commercial advantage
(specifically a SPAM-email eliminator with SPAM in the name).

In article ,
Ron Natalie wrote:

"Kevin McCue" wrote in message
...
Jim-

Better be careful using that "S" word. Hormel is now vigorously
defending its trademark in the email world.

Hormel has no problem (at least they claim they don't) with people using
SPAM as a term to describe email. What they are protecting is anybody
attempting to use the SPAM trademark to any other commercial advantage
(specifically a SPAM-email eliminator with SPAM in the name).



It's more complicated -- the folks getting sued apparently used an image
of the Hormel can in their advertising.

There are _lots_ of *registered* trademarks using the word 'spam' -- many
of which are related to the e-mail 'problem' -- that are _not_ owned by
Hormel.

A 'search' on the U.S. Govt trademark office website shows over SIXTY
different trademarks using the word SPAM. 12 of them are registered by
Hormel.

The folks getting sued are one of the _newest_ registrants in that list..