A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PPL question payment for flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 17th 03, 06:36 PM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Gottlieb"
snip
No monetary compensation is involved
(nor other "favors" from her friend, for those of you with dirty minds).
All I get out of it is time flying, and I bear all the costs. I would

have
no other reason to fly to that particular field (although no reason not to
either).


No dirty minds here. We believe you, nothing happened with "the friend."

....so, why do you think your wife (and her friend) wanted you out of town
for the afternoon?? g

Answer to your FAA question: You are acting as a (money losing) air taxi
service. Bad.

Hey, what a coincidence. I was planning to fly over there next Wednesday
anyway. Not bad.

--
Montblack



  #2  
Old July 17th 03, 11:35 PM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
.. .
No dirty minds here. We believe you, nothing happened with "the friend."


...so, why do you think your wife (and her friend) wanted you out of town
for the afternoon?? g


Maybe I should have done something with the friend... I never thought of
that angle!

Answer to your FAA question: You are acting as a (money losing) air taxi
service. Bad.


So, in the eyes of the FAA, I would have to drive a car instead?

Hey, what a coincidence. I was planning to fly over there next Wednesday
anyway. Not bad.


How did you know that?


  #3  
Old July 18th 03, 09:05 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Peter Gottlieb wrote:

Maybe I should have done something with the friend... I never thought of
that angle!


Well, the mother of a pair of Young Eagles wanted to fly along last Saturday.
I can testify that you can't accomplish much along those lines in a Maule
with no auto-pilot. :-)

George Patterson
The optimist feels that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist is afraid that he's correct.
James Branch Cavel
  #4  
Old July 18th 03, 10:52 PM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You'll have to borrow a Cherokee 6 at least. With a pilot who won't look
back...


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Peter Gottlieb wrote:

Maybe I should have done something with the friend... I never thought

of
that angle!


Well, the mother of a pair of Young Eagles wanted to fly along last

Saturday.
I can testify that you can't accomplish much along those lines in a Maule
with no auto-pilot. :-)

George Patterson
The optimist feels that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist is afraid that he's correct.
James Branch Cavel



  #5  
Old July 18th 03, 05:34 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Montblack" wrote in message ...
"Peter Gottlieb"
snip
No monetary compensation is involved
(nor other "favors" from her friend, for those of you with dirty minds).
All I get out of it is time flying, and I bear all the costs. I would

have
no other reason to fly to that particular field (although no reason not to
either).


No dirty minds here. We believe you, nothing happened with "the friend."

...so, why do you think your wife (and her friend) wanted you out of town
for the afternoon?? g

Answer to your FAA question: You are acting as a (money losing) air taxi
service. Bad.


Gotta disagree with this one Montblack. If there was no
compensation involved, Peter is not acting as an air taxi. As far as
the FAA is concerned, you can fly anyone, anywhere, anytime as long as
you (the pilot) are paying for all costs associated with the flight.

The "commonality of purpose" and "pro rata share" tests only come
into play when money or other compensation is exchanged. Basically,
the rule exists to keep private pilots from making commercial flights.
The absence of any sort of compensation makes Peter's flight legit.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handheld battery question RobsSanta General Aviation 8 September 19th 04 03:07 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question jlauer Home Built 7 November 16th 03 01:51 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
Partnership Question Harry Gordon Owning 4 August 16th 03 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.