![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To his *credit*? He was acting like a jackass, and you think it was to
his *credit* that he didn't resist against obviously overwhelming force when he was booted off the plane for being a jackass? He simply decided he didn't want to see the inside of a jail. So essentially, he 'believed' in his cause enough to cause consternation for others and to disobey the captain of the airliner, but lacked the stones to go to jail for his beliefs. His call...but hardly anything worthy of admiration. A remarkable number of Americans seem to think that because they think they *should* have the right to do something means that they *should* so that thing. Given the current sensitivity, I think most passengers would be a bit concerned seeing somebody saunter down to the lav wearing a button saying 'suspected terrorist'. Is he really a suspected terrorist? Is he being transported on this plane? If he is, where are his keepers? Why should the 'rights' of a self-aggrandizing fool to yelp 'it's sort of a fire!' in a theater trump the rights of the passengers (many of whom are naturally fearful of flying) to have a flight that is not unnecessarily fear-inducing? Obviously BA had the right to boot him. In fact, he agreed to that right when he purchased a ticket. That isn't in doubt. But what I find ironic is that this moron is acting like the wounded party because he didn't get to exercise his 'right' to call attention to himself and make other people feel uncomfortable. His 'Hey! Look at me! I'm being clever! LOOK AT ME!' is a pethetic example of the histrionic tendency that many (often otherwise worthless) people have developed....I guess if you don't do anything worthy of note, if you can get enough people to look at you, then that's close enough. Pathetic. "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message et... | | | | He was wearing a BUTTON, for god's sake. A while ago someone was kicked out | of a mall for wearing a t-shirt that expressed an anti-war opinion. In each | of these cases, could the respective parties force the patrons to leave? | Sure, they could and they did. However, I wonder what we have come to when | this happens, when many of us are so intollerant of differing opinions. Who | does this remind me of? Are we becoming extremists in our thinking too? | | That is a whole different issue. While I would say that British Airways has a right to be intolerant of divergent political opinions, I would also say that their actions exhibit an extremist point of view. I think their actions also do their business more harm than good. To Mr. Gilmore's credit, he does not appear to have resisted being taken off the airplane. His threat to sue is another matter, since that involves government enforcement. If Mr. Gilmore had not threatened to sue the airline I would not have a problem with anything he did. That does not meant that I agree with his point of view. It does mean that I would not have a problem with the way that he expressed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Captain Wubba" wrote in message om... | To his *credit*? He was acting like a jackass, and you think it was to | his *credit* that he didn't resist against obviously overwhelming | force when he was booted off the plane for being a jackass? We must be thankful for small blessings. :-) Seriously, given the nature of this individual, he could well have become violent. At least he maintained enough of a grasp of reality to know that he was fighting a losing battle. As I said, he is a hypocrite. You never know what such people might do. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point
![]() Cap "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Captain Wubba" wrote in message om... | To his *credit*? He was acting like a jackass, and you think it was to | his *credit* that he didn't resist against obviously overwhelming | force when he was booted off the plane for being a jackass? We must be thankful for small blessings. :-) Seriously, given the nature of this individual, he could well have become violent. At least he maintained enough of a grasp of reality to know that he was fighting a losing battle. As I said, he is a hypocrite. You never know what such people might do. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
ISRAELI TORTURE CONNECTION: WHO IS JOHN ISRAEL? | MORRIS434 | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 12th 04 09:17 PM |
ISRAELI TORTURE CONNECTION: WHO IS JOHN ISRAEL? | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | May 12th 04 09:16 PM |
John Kerry insults military reserves | T. Nguyen | Military Aviation | 15 | February 23rd 04 01:22 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |